TLDR
- GOP Senator Thom Tillis pledges to oppose the Clarity Act without ethics safeguards included
- The senator demands restrictions on how White House personnel can benefit financially from cryptocurrency
- Democratic lawmakers are pushing for prohibitions on federal workers endorsing or creating digital tokens
- TD Cowen investment bank identifies Tillis as the “latest roadblock” hindering legislation progress
- Financial analysts now estimate just a 33% probability of bill passage in 2025
GOP Senator Thom Tillis has issued a firm ultimatum regarding the Senate’s cryptocurrency regulation framework, the Clarity Act, stating he will oppose the legislation unless it incorporates provisions restricting government officials’ ability to benefit from digital assets.
The North Carolina senator articulated his stance clearly this Monday. “Ethics language must be incorporated into the legislation before it exits the Senate, or I will transition from being a negotiator to voting in opposition,” Tillis informed Politico.
As a prominent member of the Senate Banking Committee, Tillis wields considerable authority over the bill’s trajectory through the legislative process.
His decision not to pursue re-election adds weight to his position, as political observers note this freedom removes typical electoral pressures that might otherwise influence his voting behavior.
TD Cowen investment bank characterized Tillis as the newest obstacle confronting the legislation. “We anticipate Tillis maintaining his position, particularly given his recent successful confrontation with the President regarding the Federal Reserve,” stated Jaret Seiberg, managing director at TD Cowen’s Washington Research Group.
Tillis previously prevented action on Kevin Warsh’s Fed chairman nomination, reversing his opposition only after the Justice Department concluded an investigation into current chairman Jerome Powell last Friday. Subsequently, he announced his support for Warsh’s appointment.
Ethics Provisions at the Center of the Debate
Democratic legislators have vigorously advocated for ethics requirements within the bill. Senator Adam Schiff indicated earlier this year that Democrats seek “a prohibition on sponsoring, endorsing or issuing digital assets applicable to all federal employees,” encompassing the president.
Such provisions would presumably impact the Trump family’s ventures, which include launching a memecoin and non-fungible tokens associated with the president’s brand and likeness.
Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego emphasized that “no final bill — no final progress — will occur without bipartisan consensus on the ethics provision.”
Senator Schiff reported advancing discussions. “We have engaged in prolonged talks with limited headway, but now that other components of the bill are coalescing, we’re closing the gap on our disagreements,” he noted.
What the Bill Does
The Clarity Act divides cryptocurrency oversight between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The House approved its version of the measure in July.
The legislation has encountered multiple postponements related to ethics requirements, stablecoin yield distribution, and various outstanding matters.
TD Cowen’s Seiberg identified additional obstacles, including insufficient commissioners at the CFTC, apprehensions about the Trump-affiliated crypto initiative World Liberty Financial, and issues surrounding Iran’s utilization of cryptocurrency transactions.
Seiberg stated last month he is “growing increasingly doubtful” and calculates the probability of passage this year at approximately one in three. He has previously suggested the bill might be postponed until 2027, with implementing regulations potentially becoming effective as late as 2029.
Tillis requested the Senate Banking Committee postpone markup proceedings on the bill until May.





