Key Points
- American intelligence organizations claim Chinese AI developers have been “aggressively” copying capabilities from leading US models such as Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Grok
- Identified firms include DeepSeek, Alibaba, Moonshot AI, and Z.ai, with alleged operations conducted with Beijing’s knowledge
- Beijing’s Commerce Ministry dismissed the allegations as baseless and threatened “resolute countermeasures” should Washington target Chinese AI companies
- Chinese officials characterized distillation as standard industry practice employed globally, suggesting US firms may similarly extract from Chinese systems
- The confrontation unfolds before scheduled Trump-Xi discussions later this month where AI oversight is anticipated to feature prominently
Three major American security organizationsāthe FBI, National Security Agency, and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agencyāreleased a coordinated alert Tuesday claiming Chinese AI companies have been systematically extracting capabilities from premier US artificial intelligence platforms on an “industrial scale.” The compromised systems encompassed Anthropic’s Claude, OpenAI’s GPT, Google’s Gemini, and xAI’s Grok, with documented activity dating to at least the final months of 2024.
The coordinated statement explicitly identified DeepSeek, Alibaba, Moonshot AI, MiniMax, StepFun, and Z.ai as participants in these operations. American intelligence officials claimed these activities occurred “likely with Chinese government awareness” and involved sophisticated routing techniques through multiple channels designed to circumvent service agreements.
According to US intelligence assessments, Chinese developers employed mass acquisitions of premium subscription plans distributed among engineering teams as a cost-reduction strategy throughout these extraction operations.
Beijing Issues Strong Rebuttal
China’s Commerce Ministry dismissed the allegations as completely unfounded Wednesday. Officials characterized distillation as an established methodology employed by artificial intelligence developers worldwide, including American firms. The ministry described the accusations as evidence of American “anxiety and double standards.”
“If the US suppresses Chinese AI companies under the pretext of targeting distillation, China will take resolute countermeasures,” the ministry said in a statement.
China’s Foreign Affairs Ministry similarly urged Washington to cease what it termed “unfounded accusations.” Spokesperson Mao Ning emphasized that China’s artificial intelligence achievements stem from indigenous technological advancement and advocated for international collaboration.
The ministry expressed China’s readiness to engage in “constructive and professional discussions” with Washington regarding AI matters, grounded in equality and reciprocal advantage. However, officials emphasized unambiguously that any American measures targeting Chinese enterprises would trigger corresponding responses.
Technology Confrontation Before Presidential Meeting
This controversy emerges just weeks ahead of President Donald Trump’s anticipated hosting of Chinese leader Xi Jinping at the White House for their second bilateral summit this year. Artificial intelligence governance is projected to dominate discussions.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also entered the debate Tuesday, declaring at Southern Methodist University that China “can never get ahead” of America in artificial intelligence development.
“The Chinese distill our models and they can never get ahead of us,” Bessent said.
The confrontation underscores the broader technological rivalry between both nations. Chinese platforms such as Moonshot’s Kimi K3 have established market presence in America, regarded by certain observers as more cost-effective and efficient alternatives to domestic systems.
Both OpenAI and Anthropic have independently leveled comparable accusations against Chinese developers previously. Tuesday’s coordinated intelligence alert furnished substantially more granular information than prior statements, identifying specific American systems targeted and their intended applications.
The Chinese companies named in the advisory did not respond to media inquiries seeking comment.





