Key Takeaways
- Meta developed “Project OT,” an internal initiative designed to eliminate up to 60% of certain teams through two phases, substituting human workers with AI-powered agents
- CEO Mark Zuckerberg reversed course mere hours before implementing the second phase, capping workforce reductions at approximately 10% (~8,000 positions)
- While AI-generated code surged 220% annually, meaningful user-facing enhancements increased by only 36%
- An independent legal action alleges Meta deployed AI systems to deliberately target workers on medical or family leave for termination
- The company intends to allocate no less than $130 billion toward AI infrastructure development in 2026, potentially exhausting its entire operational cash reserves
Shares of Meta (META) climbed 1.21% amid intensifying scrutiny over the company’s controversial internal AI overhaul strategy, an emerging employment discrimination lawsuit, and mounting concerns regarding the return on its massive AI investments.
On August 26, Reuters released an extensive investigation drawing from confidential internal documentation and interviews with over 20 sources, exposing the ambitious scope of Meta’s previously undisclosed workforce transformation initiative.
Dubbed Project OT (Organization Transformation), the strategy originated during Meta’s executive leadership summit held at Zuckerberg’s Hawaiian estate in January. The core objective: transform Meta into an “AI native” enterprise where artificial intelligence agents would assume responsibilities currently handled by human personnel.
During strategic planning sessions, leadership contemplated workforce reductions as steep as 60% within certain departments. The implementation roadmap divided the restructuring into two distinct phases—the initial phase launching May 20, followed by a more extensive November rollout targeting additional positions.
With approximately 79,000 employees on the payroll at that juncture, a 20% overall reduction would have meant eliminating close to 16,000 positions across the organization.
Sudden Course Reversal
Late on May 19, just hours before the scheduled commencement of the first round of terminations, Zuckerberg made an abrupt strategic pivot. Meta proceeded with the 10% reduction on the morning of May 20—affecting roughly 8,000 employees—but completely abandoned the planned November wave.
In subsequent communications with staff, Zuckerberg stated he did “not expect other company-wide layoffs this year.”
The dramatic reversal followed emerging internal performance data that cast serious doubt on the effectiveness of the AI-driven approach. Despite AI tools generating a 220% year-over-year increase in code production, actual modifications resulting in tangible new features or improvements visible to end users grew by merely 36%.
Concurrently, security breaches and technical malfunctions—including system outages and potential data compromise incidents—escalated by 40% compared to the previous year. Employee hours devoted to addressing these complications surged 70%.
Internal workforce morale had also deteriorated significantly. Meta deployed monitoring software on U.S.-based employees’ computing devices to record keystrokes and cursor movements, intending to train AI agents to duplicate human work patterns. Numerous employees concluded they were essentially training the systems designed to replace them.
Employee satisfaction metrics plummeted from 74% positive to 55% positive in Meta’s biannual Pulse employee survey.
Legal Challenge Emerges
A distinct lawsuit initiated in July alleges that Meta utilized AI-driven analytical tools to systematically identify and terminate employees who were utilizing medical leave or caring for family members under protected leave policies.
Meta rejected these allegations, asserting that “workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI.”
Employment law specialists interviewed by Forbes indicated the lawsuit’s outcome may depend on whether Meta’s employee selection methodology disproportionately impacted workers on protected leave, highlighting that both California and New York—where affected employees work—maintain robust employment protection statutes.
Current Status
Meta acknowledged Project OT’s existence, characterizing it as a cost optimization and organizational restructuring initiative. Company representatives clarified that eliminating 60% of the total workforce was never the intention, and that multiple major business units were excluded from the restructuring plan.
During an internal company-wide meeting in early July, Zuckerberg conceded that AI agent technology development had not “accelerated” at the pace he anticipated, though he expressed confidence in meaningful progress emerging within the subsequent three to six months.
Meta has committed to investing a minimum of $130 billion in AI processing hardware and supporting infrastructure throughout 2026. Financial analysts project this capital expenditure will absorb the company’s entire operating cash flow for that fiscal year.
META stock showed a 1.21% gain at the time this report was compiled.





