Key Takeaways
- Senate Banking Committee published complete Clarity Act text Monday night before May 14 markup session.
- Legislation features limitations on stablecoin interest payments and safeguards for decentralized finance developers.
- Traditional banking sector demands stricter stablecoin regulations, citing concerns about deposit flight.
- Ethics rules preventing government officials from crypto profit-taking remain absent — Democrats demand inclusion.
- Prediction markets show 64% probability of Trump signing Clarity Act into law in 2025.
Late Monday evening, the Senate Banking Committee unveiled the complete text of the Clarity Act, timing its release just before the May 14 markup hearing. This legislation represents one of the most comprehensive efforts yet to establish formal regulatory guidelines for America’s cryptocurrency sector.
Chairman Tim Scott of the Banking Committee stated the legislation “prioritizes consumer protection, fights illegal finance, targets criminals and foreign threats, and ensures the financial future remains in American hands.”
The 309-page legislative document wasn’t entirely new to industry insiders, as it had been shared privately among stakeholders beforehand. Throughout the night, trade organizations analyzed the language to verify their key objectives survived into the final version.
The legislation addresses three primary domains: regulations governing stablecoin yields, liability shields for DeFi creators, and enhanced enforcement mechanisms for authorities combating cryptocurrency-based money laundering.
Banking Industry Clashes With Crypto Sector Over Stablecoin Interest
Among the most controversial elements involves [[LINK_START_0]]stablecoin[[LINK_END_0]] compensation structures. The present draft prohibits cryptocurrency platforms from offering interest on dormant stablecoin holdings. Only rewards tied to specific activities would be allowed.
Coinbase Chief Executive Brian Armstrong commented Monday that “not every stakeholder received their complete wish list, but critical requirements were met.” He noted Coinbase is collaborating with no fewer than five major international banks on crypto integration.
The traditional banking sector, however, remains dissatisfied. Rob Nichols, CEO of the American Bankers Association, distributed correspondence to bank executives encouraging them to contact senators prior to the vote.
Nichols cautioned that existing language would “create unnecessary incentives for bank deposits to migrate into payment stablecoins, threatening both economic expansion and financial stability.”
Banking industry groups submitted additional correspondence to Banking Committee senators requesting more stringent limitations on stablecoin compensation.
Galaxy’s research team countered these warnings, contending that stablecoin expansion will primarily stem from international capital entering U.S. banking systems rather than domestic deposit transfers.
Conflict-of-Interest Language Creates Political Impasse
The current bill lacks a conflict-of-interest section that would prevent government officials from cryptocurrency-related profits. This provision exceeds the banking committee’s authority and requires later addition.
Democratic senators have established the ethics language as mandatory for their backing. Senator Elizabeth Warren characterized the bill as something that “amplifies Donald Trump’s crypto conflicts,” referencing approximately $1.4 billion in cryptocurrency profits accumulated by the president and his relatives since inauguration.
White House cryptocurrency advisor Patrick Witt indicated the administration supports universally applicable government regulations, but opposes measures targeting particular officeholders.
Senate Republicans anticipate moving the legislation forward along partisan divisions during the May 14 markup. Subsequently, it must be reconciled with corresponding legislation from the Senate Agriculture Committee before reaching a full Senate vote.
Sixty affirmative votes are necessary for Senate floor passage, requiring Democratic cooperation. The White House aims for July 4 completion. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand forecasts passage by early August.
Polymarket currently assigns 64% probability to Trump signing the Clarity Act into law this year.





