Key Points
- Brad Garlinghouse appeals to senators to support the Clarity Act ahead of this week’s procedural vote.
- Republicans introduced a modified version incorporating over 100 amendments requested by Democratic members.
- Prediction markets temporarily showed passage odds climbing to 35% before retreating.
- Democratic Senators Mark Warner and Ruben Gallego maintain the current version remains inadequate.
- A cloture vote scheduled for Tuesday will determine whether the legislation can move forward in 2026.
Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, is calling on members of the U.S. Senate to support the Clarity Act as Congress approaches a critical procedural decision. The legislation continues to encounter opposition even after extensive negotiations and substantial revisions to the Senate proposal.
Garlinghouse emphasized that the present draft represents genuine compromises from both political parties. He maintained that legislators should proceed with the measure rather than stalling over unresolved disagreements.
Garlinghouse Makes Public Appeal Before Critical Vote
In a statement released on Tuesday, Garlinghouse described the bill as the product of challenging policy negotiations. He reiterated his position that the quest for ideal legislation should yield to practical compromise.
The Ripple executive echoed sentiments expressed by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who similarly urged Senate action on the proposal. Both statements arrived as advocates worked to maintain legislative traction ahead of the upcoming Senate decision.
Updated Bill Encounters Continued Opposition
The Republican leadership unveiled a substantially modified Clarity Act during the weekend following protracted discussions. The revision incorporated more than 100 amendments proposed by Democratic colleagues and addressed multiple contentious provisions.
The modifications temporarily boosted confidence in the legislation’s prospects. Polymarket probability indicators for 2026 passage increased from approximately 20% to roughly 35% on September 14 as negotiation progress appeared promising.
Optimism diminished after multiple Democratic senators indicated the updated language remained insufficient. Senator Mark Warner declared the revisions inadequate, while Senator Ruben Gallego similarly voiced reservations.
Aides working for Senator Elizabeth Warren on the Senate Banking Committee distributed materials opposing the compromise proposal. Their resistance introduced additional doubt regarding whether the measure can garner sufficient backing to proceed.
Procedural Decision Will Determine Legislative Path
Lawmakers will conduct a cloture vote Tuesday on the motion to proceed. This procedural measure will reveal whether sufficient support exists to advance consideration of the Clarity Act.
A negative outcome would halt momentum on the crypto legislation. Another setback would compress the remaining timeline for completing the legislative process in 2026, particularly as competing priorities demand Senate attention.
Garlinghouse’s intervention arrives at a pivotal juncture for the debate. Proponents maintain pressure for action, while critics contend the current compromise demands further modification before Senate advancement.





