Key Takeaways
- Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella gave testimony in Elon Musk’s legal case against OpenAI and Microsoft at the US District Court in Oakland
- Nadella revealed he received no advance warning about Sam Altman’s dismissal and was never provided with a clear reason
- Elon Musk’s lawsuit targets OpenAI, Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and Microsoft, with damages sought reaching $180 billion
- Former OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever provided testimony, disclosing his OpenAI ownership is valued at approximately $7 billion
- Sam Altman is scheduled to provide testimony in the coming days
On Monday, Microsoft’s top executive Satya Nadella appeared in court to provide testimony in the ongoing legal battle initiated by Elon Musk against OpenAI and key figures within the organization. The proceedings are taking place at the US District Court located in Oakland, California.
The lawsuit, filed by Musk, names OpenAI, its chief executive Sam Altman, president Greg Brockman, and Microsoft as defendants. Musk alleges that Altman and Brockman deceived him into contributing substantial sums—tens of millions of dollars—to OpenAI under the premise it would remain a nonprofit organization, only for the entity to later transition into a for-profit enterprise.
During his court appearance, Nadella recounted being abruptly removed from a business meeting in November 2023 to receive news of Altman’s termination. He emphasized that no one had forewarned him of the impending decision, nor was he ever provided with a convincing justification for the action.
“There may have been some jealousy coming through,” Nadella remarked when questioned about the board’s official explanation that Altman had failed to maintain consistent candor with board members.
Nadella expressed concern at the time that a mass exodus of OpenAI personnel might follow Altman’s departure. The CEO was subsequently restored to his position shortly thereafter, an episode referred to during trial proceedings as “the blip.”
Questions About Microsoft’s Influence
Musk’s attorneys have contended that Microsoft, having pledged $13 billion to OpenAI, leveraged its substantial financial investment to exercise authority over the company’s operations. Nadella disputed this characterization throughout his testimony.
He explained that his widely-quoted statement — “We are below them, above them, around them” — referred to Microsoft’s collaborative partnership and technological access to OpenAI’s innovations, rather than any form of operational control.
Nadella further confirmed that although both executives possessed each other’s contact information, Musk never reached out to him to express any reservations about Microsoft’s financial commitment or its licensing agreement for GPT-3.
Evidence presented in court included a group chat conversation involving Nadella, Altman, and Microsoft’s chief technology officer Kevin Scott. The exchange demonstrated Nadella’s approval of one of Altman’s proposed candidates for a vacancy on OpenAI’s board. The individual in question, Sue Desmond-Hellmann, ultimately joined the board in 2024.
Additional Details From Sutskever’s Testimony
Ilya Sutskever, a founding member of OpenAI, also provided testimony on Monday. He stated that in 2023, he informed the board that Altman’s conduct was “not conducive” to developing safe AI.
Sutskever acknowledged telling board members that Altman displayed a consistent pattern of dishonesty and had undermined other executives. However, he subsequently added his signature to an employee petition demanding Altman’s reinstatement, citing concerns that the organization would otherwise face collapse.
He additionally revealed that his ownership interest in OpenAI currently holds a value of approximately $7 billion. Sutskever departed from OpenAI in May 2024 to establish his own venture, Safe Superintelligence, which now carries a valuation exceeding $30 billion.
Musk’s lawsuit demands up to $180 billion in damages and calls for the removal of both Altman and Brockman from their current positions. Sam Altman is anticipated to provide his testimony before the week concludes.





