Key Highlights
- Trading volume for Kalshi’s perpetual futures contracts reached $5.5 billion in the first 14 days
- The platform received CFTC authorization for its bitcoin-based perpetual futures product (BTCPERP) on May 29, 2026
- Eleven crypto perpetual contracts are currently available, with non-crypto assets under consideration
- A new StarCompliance integration allows companies to track their employees’ prediction market activity
- The compliance initiative supports Kalshi’s strategy to appeal to institutional finance players
The prediction market operator Kalshi recently experienced significant developments across multiple fronts. The platform rolled out regulated perpetual futures contracts, recorded $5.5 billion in trading activity, and established a compliance partnership — all strategic moves designed to appeal to institutional investors.
Explosive Growth in Perpetual Futures Trading
On May 29, 2026, the CFTC granted approval for Kalshi’s bitcoin-referenced perpetual futures instrument, designated as BTCPERP. Trading commenced on June 3.
The notional trading volume surpassed $1 billion within the initial seven-day period. After two weeks of operation, the figure had climbed beyond $5.5 billion.
Kalshi presently maintains 11 active perpetual contracts, each linked to cryptocurrency assets. To encourage market participation and liquidity development, the platform temporarily eliminated trading fees during the launch phase.
Perpetual futures represent derivative instruments without expiration dates. These products employ periodic funding mechanisms to maintain price alignment with their reference assets.
While perpetual contracts rank among the most traded instruments in cryptocurrency venues globally, American traders previously needed to use offshore platforms to access them.
Kalshi’s offering stands apart — it operates under U.S. regulatory oversight and domestic clearing, a development the CFTC characterized as groundbreaking.
According to company statements, discussions with regulatory bodies are underway regarding the extension of perpetual futures to additional asset categories beyond digital currencies. Such expansion would position Kalshi as a direct competitor in established commodity and equity derivatives sectors.
The platform has also recently surpassed competitor Polymarket in monthly taker volume metrics. Polymarket has since disclosed intentions to launch its own U.S.-based perpetual futures offerings.
Corporate Surveillance Enters the Prediction Market Space
Regarding compliance developments, Kalshi unveiled a collaboration with StarCompliance, a specialized firm that assists financial institutions in monitoring employee trading behavior.
Staff members at organizations utilizing StarCompliance will connect their Kalshi accounts to the monitoring platform. The system conducts real-time trade surveillance and can identify potentially problematic transactions.
The objective is preventing employees from exploiting prediction markets to capitalize on confidential, material information — a growing concern as these platforms gain prominence.
Kelvin Dickenson, StarCompliance’s chief product officer, indicated the system may eventually mandate pre-clearance requirements before employees can execute trades.
Max Crowley, Kalshi’s VP of business development, explained the integration originated from a New York hedge fund’s request. The firm wanted to participate on Kalshi but faced obstacles due to the absence of StarCompliance compatibility.
Last week, Kalshi additionally implemented employer disclosure requirements for traders engaging with markets carrying elevated insider trading risks.
JPMorgan has advised its workforce to exercise caution when considering prediction market trades related to the financial services industry. Credit rating agency KBRA has implemented a complete prohibition on employee participation in prediction markets.
Kalshi simultaneously faces ongoing legal challenges. The company recently filed suit against Minnesota to challenge a felony-level prohibition on prediction markets. Separately, the CFTC is defending its regulatory authority in litigation pending in Massachusetts.





