TLDR
DCG faces lawsuit over Genesis’ financial mismanagement, seeking $3.3B recovery.
Genesis lawsuit reveals DCG ignored risk warnings and used deceptive tactics to avoid liabilities.
Allegations against DCG: Genesis mismanagement, toxic culture, and misleading transactions exposed.
Genesis sues DCG for $3.3B, accusing executives of financial negligence and deception.
A newly unsealed lawsuit against Digital Currency Group (DCG) reveals allegations that the company used its subsidiary, Genesis, as an “alter ego” to mismanage funds and avoid legal risks. The complaint, filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery, outlines a series of internal communications that suggest DCG executives were well aware of the financial instability within Genesis but chose to ignore warnings of potential legal fallout.
DCG Executives Prepared for Legal Fallout
The complaint reveals a confidential memo from DCG’s Chief Financial Officer, Michael Kraines, to former Genesis CEO Michael Moro. In the memo, Kraines admitted the risk that Genesis could be considered DCG’s “alter ego,” a situation that could expose the parent company to legal liabilities.
Kraines outlined a “war-gaming exercise” where he considered the legal arguments a potential plaintiff might use if Genesis collapsed. The memo shows that DCG executives were already bracing for the possibility of a legal disaster.
Kraines wrote, “The question on my mind simply put is ‘if Genesis were to somehow blow itself up, could that somehow tank DCG to the profound detriment of its board and shareholders?'” This comment underscores the internal acknowledgment of significant risks but also points to a lack of decisive action to address them.
DCG Ignored Risk Warnings
The lawsuit highlights that DCG had been warned repeatedly by third-party risk consultants about the potential fallout from Genesis’s financial mismanagement. Despite these warnings, the company continued to ignore or delay taking action. Internal documents show that DCG recognized that Genesis was “flying blind” as its loan book grew from $4 billion to $12 billion.
Even though external auditors flagged “significant deficiencies and material weaknesses” in Genesis’s financial controls as early as 2020, DCG failed to implement meaningful changes. The company’s reluctance to address these issues is believed to have played a role in Genesis’s eventual collapse.
Furthermore, the lawsuit details the formation of a “contagion risk committee” within Genesis to address potential risks. However, the first meeting of the committee did not take place until nine months after the DCG board had approved it. The delay was reportedly acknowledged by Kraines, who joked that the delay would make his future deposition “a bit easier.”
Toxic Workplace Culture at Genesis
The lawsuit also paints a picture of a toxic workplace culture within Genesis. According to an insider, DCG’s control over Genesis created a “culture of submission” where employees were expected to prioritize the interests of DCG over proper governance. One employee claimed that DCG kept Genesis operational “so [it] could pillage the balance sheet.”
These accusations suggest that DCG’s management strategy focused on propping up Genesis only to extract funds from it, ultimately misleading creditors and investors about the company’s stability. The lawsuit claims that this pattern of behavior contributed to Genesis’s financial downfall and the subsequent bankruptcy filing.
Allegations of Deception and Misleading Transactions
Genesis’s lawsuit also points to instances of public deception, particularly following the collapse of the crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Employees were allegedly instructed to use scripted messages to downplay the crisis, while DCG executives, including CEO Barry Silbert, retweeted posts that minimized the severity of the situation.
The complaint further accuses DCG of concealing Genesis’s insolvency through controversial financial transactions. These include a promissory note issued on June 30, 2022, and a “roundtrip” deal in September 2022. The lawsuit suggests that these transactions were designed to hide Genesis’s financial troubles and mislead creditors about the company’s true financial state.
As part of the ongoing lawsuit, Genesis is seeking to recover more than $3.3 billion from DCG, Barry Silbert, and other key insiders. The case continues to unfold, with both parties expected to present their arguments in the coming months.
Stay Ahead of the Market with Benzinga Pro!
Want to trade like a pro? Benzinga Pro gives you the edge you need in today's fast-paced markets. Get real-time news, exclusive insights, and powerful tools trusted by professional traders:
- Breaking market-moving stories before they hit mainstream media
- Live audio squawk for hands-free market updates
- Advanced stock scanner to spot promising trades
- Expert trade ideas and on-demand support
