Key Points
- Hayden Adams, creator of Uniswap, alleges Sam Bankman-Fried acquired the Uniswap.com domain for a seven-figure sum.
- The domain reportedly redirected visitors to SushiSwap, a rival decentralized exchange platform.
- In September 2021, WIPO mandated the transfer of Uniswap.com to Uniswap Labs following a bad-faith determination.
- Official WIPO documentation fails to identify Bankman-Fried as the domain’s buyer.
- The Uniswap.com domain currently forwards users to Uniswap’s primary application.
Hayden Adams, the founder of Uniswap, has alleged that Sam Bankman-Fried previously acquired the Uniswap.com domain for a seven-figure price tag before Uniswap Labs ultimately secured ownership through legal channels.
Adams shared this revelation in a September 21 post on X, where he reflected on the domain’s controversial history.
According to Adams, the initial domain holders approached Uniswap requesting a seven-figure payment for Uniswap.com, which the development team refused.
Adams alleges that Bankman-Fried subsequently purchased the domain at that price point, and it was then redirected to a protocol fork competing with Uniswap.
Domain Directed Traffic to Competing SushiSwap Platform
Public documentation verifies that Uniswap.com redirected visitors to SushiSwap throughout 2021.
SushiSwap emerged as a Uniswap fork and operated as a direct competitor in the decentralized exchange ecosystem.
Uniswap Labs submitted a formal complaint regarding the domain in May 2021.
The World Intellectual Property Organization subsequently examined archived website versions and photographic evidence demonstrating Uniswap.com redirecting to SushiSwap’s interface.
The WIPO arbitration panel determined that Uniswap Labs possessed legitimate registered trademark rights for UNISWAP.
Furthermore, the panel ruled that redirecting traffic to SushiSwap constituted illegitimate domain usage.
According to the panel’s findings, the redirect posed a significant risk of consumer confusion, potentially leading users to believe Uniswap Labs had affiliated with, sponsored, or approved the destination platform.
WIPO concluded that both the registration and usage of the domain demonstrated bad faith.
On September 3, 2021, the arbitration panel mandated the transfer of Uniswap.com to Universal Navigation Inc., the corporate entity operating as Uniswap Labs.
This legal resolution didn’t require Uniswap Labs to compensate the respondent for the domain.
Official WIPO Documentation Lacks SBF Reference
A critical element of Adams’ narrative remains unverified by official case documentation.
The WIPO ruling identifies the respondent as Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC and Future XXX based in Hong Kong.
Bankman-Fried’s name doesn’t appear anywhere in the official record as either purchaser or registrant of Uniswap.com.
The documentation also contains no reference to any seven-figure transaction.
Adams’ X post didn’t include supporting transaction records or identify who sold the domain.
Bankman-Fried did maintain a documented association with SushiSwap previously.
During a September 2020 governance emergency, he briefly assumed project leadership after the anonymous creator transferred control.
Bankman-Fried subsequently facilitated SushiSwap’s protocol migration before governance transitioned to a multisignature framework.
While this historical connection supports Adams’ assertion contextually, it doesn’t constitute independent verification that Bankman-Fried purchased Uniswap.com.
Uniswap.com presently redirects visitors to the authorized Uniswap platform located at app.uniswap.org.
Bankman-Fried is currently imprisoned serving a 25-year sentence related to FTX’s implosion, though the 2021 WIPO proceeding contained no personal findings regarding him.





