Key Points
- X has initiated legal proceedings against two identified individuals and additional unnamed account controllers in the United Kingdom regarding alleged creator monetization fraud.
- The platform claims a network of Bitcoin-related accounts collectively obtained a minimum of £207,384 via its creator payment system.
- According to the lawsuit, the accounts replicated content and artificially inflated each other’s metrics to maximize earnings.
- The platform terminated access to the contested accounts on August 18, subsequently filing legal action on September 17.
- X has discontinued its Creator Revenue Sharing initiative, launching a replacement program focused on original content rewards.
X has initiated legal proceedings in the United Kingdom against two identified defendants along with additional unnamed individuals accused of orchestrating a scheme centered around Bitcoin-themed accounts and creator monetization.
The legal action was submitted to the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales on September 17.
X Internet Unlimited Company and X Corp have identified Vivek Kumar Sen and Zamyang Sherpa as primary defendants, alongside unidentified parties allegedly controlling connected accounts.
The allegations remain unproven in legal proceedings, with no public defense submissions or judicial decisions available as of September 21.
Platform Accuses Bitcoin Accounts of Systematic Coordination
X contends that six principal accounts functioned as an organized network engineered to amplify monetizable user interaction.
The identified accounts comprise @Vivek4real_, @Bitcoin_Teddy, @saylordocs, @TrendingBitcoin, @Kalshibacktest and @PolyBackTest.
Based on the legal filing, certain accounts posted nearly identical content within moments of each other.
X further contends the accounts systematically engaged with one another through likes, reposts and comments.
The platform maintains this behavior was employed to inflate impression counts and maximize creator compensation under its Creator Revenue Sharing Program.
Three supplementary accounts were referenced in an attached document as allegedly participating in comparable engagement tactics.
X indicated ongoing investigation may reveal additional accounts or individuals involved.
Platform Demands Recovery of Over £207,000
X asserts it distributed no less than £207,384 to the accounts in question.
The highest individual payment cited was £74,332.44 for @Vivek4real_, with @saylordocs collecting £49,441.91, per the court documents.
Payouts associated with @Bitcoin_Teddy totaled approximately £50,000, with remaining accounts receiving lesser sums.
X additionally pursues a minimum of £75,000 to cover investigation, analysis, remediation and preventative measure expenses.
The platform alleges certain linked payment accounts featured deceptive information and that shared devices, cookies, software applications and additional digital identifiers linked portions of the network.
The legal arguments encompass fraud, contractual breach, unjust enrichment, knowing receipt and conspiracy through unlawful means.
X demands restitution or return of contested payments, compensatory damages, interest accrual and legal expenses.
Platform Transitions to New Creator Compensation Model
X deactivated the accounts on August 18 following detection of what it characterized as systematic revenue-sharing manipulation.
The service ceased enrolling new members into Creator Revenue Sharing on August 7 and terminated compensation under that framework on September 7.
X commenced implementation of its successor Original Content Rewards Program on September 8.
The revised framework calculates payments based on qualified impressions produced by original material viewed by Premium subscription holders.
Program guidelines disqualify fraudulent, purchased, promoted or synthetically generated impressions.
Duplicated posts, re-uploaded media and content offering minimal original value are similarly ineligible for compensation.
X stipulates creators are prohibited from utilizing bots, automation or alternative tactics to artificially generate engagement.
The legal case continues without resolution, with no judicial determination yet rendered regarding whether X’s allegations against Sen, Sherpa or the unnamed defendants have merit.
Get 3 Free Stock Ebooks
Discover top-performing stocks in AI, Crypto, and Technology with expert analysis.
- Top 10 AI Stocks - Leading AI companies
- Top 10 Crypto Stocks - Blockchain leaders
- Top 10 Tech Stocks - Tech giants
