Key Highlights
- Britain’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) unveiled proposals allowing app creators to direct customers toward alternative payment methods.
- The initiative specifically targets Apple and Google’s current policies that either prohibit or limit such payment redirections.
- Under the CMA’s framework, any charges imposed for payment steering must be reasonable, transparent, and significantly below existing app store fees.
- The regulator is weighing whether to mandate Apple’s opening of its NFC chip technology for third-party payment solutions.
- While Google claims it recently modified Play Store policies to permit steering, Apple maintains strong opposition citing security risks.
Britain’s top competition regulator unveiled a comprehensive framework on Tuesday that could fundamentally reshape how tech giants Apple and Google manage payment transactions within their mobile ecosystems.
The Competition and Markets Authority’s proposal centers on a practice known as “steering” — essentially allowing app developers to inform their users about payment alternatives that exist outside the walled gardens maintained by Apple and Google.
Currently, Apple maintains a complete prohibition on such practices. Google, meanwhile, enforces significant restrictions. Both companies generally mandate that developers utilize their proprietary payment infrastructure.
Breaking Down the Proposed Changes
These mandatory in-app payment channels generate commissions that can climb as high as 30% on certain transactions. The CMA’s intervention aims to disrupt this established model.
While the proposal doesn’t eliminate fees entirely for steering practices, it establishes that such charges must meet standards of fairness, reasonableness, and remain substantially lower than present commission rates.
According to the watchdog, financial benefits should either reach consumers directly or fund innovation initiatives. Will Hayter, serving as the CMA’s executive director overseeing digital markets, emphasized that the framework prioritizes expanded options for both app creators and end users.
Hayter stressed that any fees levied by Apple and Google must demonstrate clear justification through documented evidence connecting them to actual costs and delivered value.
Apple’s Contactless Payment Technology in the Crosshairs
Beyond app store payments, the CMA is evaluating whether to compel Apple to provide third-party access to its near-field communication chip technology. This hardware enables contactless payment functionality on iPhone devices.
Should this requirement materialize, developers would gain the capability to integrate payment functionality directly within their iOS applications. Such access could empower British financial technology firms to develop competitive alternatives to Apple’s proprietary wallet system.
The regulator highlighted account-to-account transactions and evolving technologies, including cryptocurrency applications, as potential beneficiaries of expanded NFC access.
These proposals emerge under Britain’s digital markets framework. This regulatory structure empowers the CMA to establish tailored requirements for organizations designated as possessing “strategic market status.”
Both Apple and Google received this classification in the previous year based on their dominant mobile platform positions.
Google’s response highlighted recent policy adjustments. The technology company modified its Play Store guidelines earlier this month to accommodate developer steering toward external payment systems.
The CMA indicated it will examine these modifications as part of its assessment process before rendering a conclusive determination later in the year.
Apple has adopted a contrarian position. The Cupertino-based company maintains its opposition to facilitating user redirection away from its integrated payment ecosystem.
An Apple representative argued that such practices could create vulnerabilities to fraudulent schemes, deceptive marketing tactics, and circumvention of parental oversight tools. The spokesperson contended that users forfeit essential protections when transactions occur outside Apple’s controlled payment framework.
Apple confirmed it will persistently communicate its objections directly to the CMA throughout the review process.
This regulatory action represents the latest in a series of CMA interventions targeting both technology giants. This past February, the authority obtained formal commitments from Apple and Google to enhance app store transparency.
Those earlier commitments addressed ranking algorithms, user review systems, and feature accessibility. However, they notably excluded commission structure reforms.
The CMA indicated at that juncture that payment steering remained among its top concerns. Regulatory bodies across the European Union, United States, and Japan have similarly intensified scrutiny of comparable app marketplace policies.





