Key Takeaways
- Federal agencies including the Fed, Treasury, OCC, and FDIC have jointly released proposed regulations mandating stablecoin companies implement bank-level customer verification procedures
- These proposed regulations flow from the GENIUS Act, which became federal law in July 2025
- Companies would need to validate customer names, physical addresses, and screen against terrorist watchlists following Bank Secrecy Act protocols
- Following Federal Register publication, stakeholders will have 60 days to submit public feedback
- Federal Reserve Governor Michael Barr expressed skepticism that the proposed framework adequately addresses secondary market transaction risks
Federal financial oversight agencies have unveiled proposed regulations that would compel stablecoin companies to implement identical customer verification protocols currently required of traditional banks.
The regulatory framework was announced Thursday through a coordinated effort involving the Federal Reserve, Department of the Treasury, FDIC, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the National Credit Union Administration.
This proposal represents a critical component in implementing the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act—commonly referenced as the GENIUS Act—which received presidential signature in July 2025.
Core Requirements of the Proposed Framework
According to the proposal, stablecoin issuers would receive designation as regulated financial institutions under Bank Secrecy Act provisions.
This classification would obligate them to authenticate the identity of each individual establishing an account, maintain comprehensive records of customer information, and cross-reference users against federal terrorist screening databases.
These obligations mirror existing compliance burdens that traditional banking institutions and brokerage firms must satisfy to combat money laundering activities and terrorism financing operations.
The proposed regulatory framework will accept public commentary for a 60-day window following its formal publication in the Federal Register scheduled for Monday.
This represents the second opportunity for stakeholder input. Treasury officials previously collected 450 comment submissions during an initial consultation phase conducted last September.
Market Landscape
Current stablecoin operators functioning within U.S. jurisdiction include Tether, responsible for the USDT token, alongside Circle, which manages USDC issuance.
Multiple established financial services organizations have also launched stablecoin offerings in recent months.
The GENIUS Act framework is scheduled to become fully operational either 18 months following presidential signature or 120 days after regulators complete their final rule determinations.
The Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has independently advanced separate regulatory proposals focused on illicit finance prevention under the same legislative authority.
In April, the FDIC put forward a proposal clarifying that federal deposit insurance coverage for stablecoin issuers would not protect individual token holders.
Regulatory Concerns Persist
Universal support for the proposal’s current parameters remains elusive among regulatory board members.
Federal Reserve Governor Michael Barr voiced ongoing apprehension that the GENIUS Act structure falls short in confronting illicit finance risks present in secondary market transactions.
Barr emphasized that “bad actors” can “far too easily evade these restrictions” during digital asset trading activities.
The 130-page regulatory proposal explicitly solicits feedback on whether identity verification mandates should encompass secondary market activity, specifically requesting public commentary on this consideration.
Separately, congressional leaders have not established a definitive schedule for advancing the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, companion legislation designed to restructure how federal agencies oversee cryptocurrency markets comprehensively.
Capitol Hill observers anticipate potential passage before the August congressional recess, though Democratic lawmakers have raised procedural objections centered on potential conflicts of interest that may decelerate legislative momentum.





