TLDR:
- Trump administration aims to reduce tariffs on China from 145% to below 60% during Geneva talks
- China has prepared a list of US goods exempt from its 125% tariffs to ease tensions
- Economic concerns have driven China to negotiate despite initial resistance
- US-China negotiations come after Trump announced a “breakthrough” trade deal with the UK
- Both sides balance trying to look tough while avoiding responsibility for global economic damage
The Trump administration plans to slash tariffs on Chinese goods significantly during upcoming trade talks in Geneva, marking a potential turning point in the escalating trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies. According to Bloomberg, US officials aim to reduce tariffs from 145% to below 60% as an initial step, hoping China will respond with similar cuts.
This development comes after President Trump indicated his willingness to reduce the high tariffs he imposed on China last month. “The 145% rate was coming down,” Trump stated, signaling a shift in his approach to US-China trade relations.
The timing of these negotiations is telling. Just a day before the news broke, Trump announced what he called a “breakthrough” trade agreement with the United Kingdom. He described it as “a great deal for both countries” that would boost US agricultural exports, including beef and ethanol.
High-level US officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, are set to meet with their Chinese counterparts this weekend. Trump has suggested he might meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping following these initial discussions.
Behind China’s Decision to Negotiate
China’s decision to come to the negotiating table wasn’t made lightly. Initially, Beijing responded to Trump’s tariffs with a hardline stance, posting images of Mao Zedong on state media and vowing not to back down to “imperialists.”
However, behind closed doors, Chinese officials grew increasingly worried about the economic impact. Reports suggest Chinese companies, particularly in furniture, toys, and textiles, have been struggling to avoid bankruptcies since losing access to the US market.
Many analysts have downgraded China’s economic growth forecasts for 2025. Investment bank Nomura has warned that the trade war could cost China up to 16 million jobs, leading the Chinese central bank to announce fresh monetary stimulus this week.
Chinese officials were also concerned about being left out while other Asian nations like Vietnam, India, and Japan began their own trade negotiations with Washington. This fear of isolation has been a key factor in China’s changed approach.
Diplomatic Challenges
The path to these talks has been rocky. Early attempts at communication were complicated by diplomatic friction. When Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao reached out to US counterpart Howard Lutnick, he was reportedly rebuffed as not senior enough for discussions.
Another sticking point was a letter sent by the US to Chinese ministries about fentanyl precursors, which Beijing considered “arrogant.” The document called for China to publicize its crackdown efforts in state media and tighten regulations on certain chemicals.
China has now put forward Vice Premier He Lifeng for the Geneva talks. As a confidant of President Xi with direct access to him, He satisfies Washington’s demand for a senior negotiator while avoiding direct exposure of the Chinese leader to potential embarrassment.
Economic Stakes
The stakes for these negotiations are high. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell noted on Wednesday that while economic sentiment has worsened, the full impact of the tariffs “hasn’t hit yet.” The central bank has held interest rates steady while monitoring developments.
China appears to have modest expectations for this weekend’s meetings. Internally, officials have downgraded the talks from a higher level to “merely a meeting,” suggesting they view this as primarily an opportunity to understand Washington’s demands after weeks of contradictory messages from Trump officials.
Among potential concessions, China could offer to purchase more American liquefied natural gas and agricultural goods, similar to the “Phase One” deal from Trump’s first term when Beijing committed to increasing US agricultural purchases by $32 billion over two years.
For now, both sides seem to recognize the need to deescalate tensions before they cause lasting damage to the global economy. As Scott Kennedy, an expert in Chinese business affairs at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, put it: “Both sides are balancing trying to look tough with not wanting to be responsible for sinking the global economy.”
The weekend talks in Geneva may represent just the beginning of what could be protracted negotiations, but they mark an important first step toward reducing trade tensions that have threatened both the US and Chinese economies.
Stay Ahead of the Market with Benzinga Pro!
Want to trade like a pro? Benzinga Pro gives you the edge you need in today's fast-paced markets. Get real-time news, exclusive insights, and powerful tools trusted by professional traders:
- Breaking market-moving stories before they hit mainstream media
- Live audio squawk for hands-free market updates
- Advanced stock scanner to spot promising trades
- Expert trade ideas and on-demand support
