TLDR
- New SEC rules require commissioner-level approval for launching formal probes
- Changes follow leadership shift after Gensler’s exit, with Uyeda as Acting Chair
- Previous protocol gave more autonomy to enforcement staff
- Informal inquiries remain unaffected by new requirements
- Industry experts divided on impact: some praise oversight, others fear delays
The Securities and Exchange Commission has introduced sweeping changes to its investigation procedures, requiring enforcement staff to obtain approval from politically appointed commissioners before launching formal probes. This marks a major shift in how the regulatory agency initiates investigations into potential market violations.
Sources close to the matter revealed to Reuters that SEC staff members must now secure explicit permission before taking formal investigative steps such as issuing subpoenas or demanding testimony. This represents a clear departure from previous practices where enforcement staff held more autonomy in initiating investigations.
The timing of these procedural changes aligns with recent leadership transitions at the SEC. Following the departure of Gary Gensler and Democrat Commissioner Jaime Lizárraga, President Trump appointed Mark Uyeda to serve as Acting Chair. The commission currently operates with three commissioners: Uyeda, Hester Peirce, and Caroline Crenshaw.
Under the previous system, enforcement staff needed approval only from the SEC’s two enforcement directors to begin formal investigations. The sources, who requested anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the information, did not specify whether the Commission held a formal vote to implement these changes.
Enforcement staff retain the ability to conduct informal investigations without commissioner approval. This means they can still send information requests and gather preliminary evidence before seeking formal authorization to proceed with a full investigation.
The crypto industry has taken particular interest in these changes, given the SEC’s recent focus on digital asset regulation. Tyler Warner, who transitioned from banking consultation to NFT market analysis, suggests the new system might prevent what he terms “rogue attacks” and ensure investigations have solid foundations before proceeding.
However, not all industry experts share this optimistic view. Marc Fagel, who built his career in SEC enforcement and securities litigation before retiring, expressed strong reservations about the changes. Based on his experience with the original delegation of formal order authority, he warned that these additional requirements could slow down investigations that already face time constraints.
The procedural shift comes after a period of increased regulatory action against cryptocurrency exchanges under Gensler’s leadership. His tenure saw numerous enforcement actions focused on alleged securities law violations within the crypto sector.
This aggressive approach sparked debate among industry participants and lawmakers. Even some Democratic legislators questioned whether Gensler’s interpretation of securities laws created unnecessary ambiguity and overreach in the crypto space.
While Gensler maintained that strict oversight was essential for protecting investors from crypto-related fraud, critics argued that his approach sometimes exceeded reasonable regulatory bounds. The new approval requirements might affect the pace and frequency of such enforcement actions.
The reduced commission size, currently operating with three members instead of five, adds another layer of complexity to the new approval process. This smaller number of commissioners must now review and authorize all formal investigations.
The changes affect investigations across all sectors under SEC jurisdiction, not just cryptocurrency markets. Every formal probe, regardless of industry focus, now requires commissioner-level authorization before proceeding.
Critics worry that adding bureaucratic layers could hamper the SEC’s ability to respond quickly to potential securities violations. They argue that market misconduct might go unchecked longer under the new system.
Supporters counter that additional oversight could lead to more focused and well-supported investigations. They suggest that commissioner review might help prioritize the most pressing cases and prevent unnecessary probes.
The practical effects of these changes remain to be seen as the SEC adapts to its new investigation protocols. The agency continues to conduct informal investigations while adjusting to the reformed approval process for formal probes.
Stay Ahead of the Market with Benzinga Pro!
Want to trade like a pro? Benzinga Pro gives you the edge you need in today's fast-paced markets. Get real-time news, exclusive insights, and powerful tools trusted by professional traders:
- Breaking market-moving stories before they hit mainstream media
- Live audio squawk for hands-free market updates
- Advanced stock scanner to spot promising trades
- Expert trade ideas and on-demand support