TLDR
- Scott Bessent urged Congress to pass the Clarity Act for digital asset rules.
- Bessent said unclear US rules pushed crypto firms to Abu Dhabi and Singapore.
- The House of Representatives passed its version of the crypto bill in July.
- The bill has faced delays over stablecoin interest and reward provisions.
- Bessent said clearer rules would help keep crypto development in the United States.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has renewed pressure on Congress to pass the Clarity Act, saying clear federal crypto rules are needed now. He warned that legal uncertainty has pushed digital asset firms overseas and said the United States risks losing development, investment, and market activity without a defined regulatory framework.
Bessent urges Congress to pass crypto regulation bill
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged Congress to pass a federal crypto regulation bill. He said clear rules are needed for digital assets in the United States. His comments came in an opinion piece published by the Wall Street Journal on April 8. The News is centered on Bessent urging Congress to pass a crypto regulation bill.
Bessent backed the Clarity Act, a market structure bill for digital assets. He said the current framework remains unclear, and that uncertainty has affected investment and development. He warned that more crypto activity could move abroad without federal rules. He said the United States needs a stable legal path for the sector.
Bessent backs Clarity Act for digital asset rules
In his opinion piece, Bessent said the lack of clear rules has had predictable results. He wrote that a growing share of crypto development moved to jurisdictions with defined standards. He named Abu Dhabi and Singapore as places where firms had clearer registration rules. He said companies there knew how to operate and what standards to meet.
Bessent wrote, “The regulatory framework for digital asset markets is unclear.” He added that firms abroad had more certainty than those based in the United States. He said the benefits of operating in the United States often did not outweigh the legal risks. His argument focused on keeping crypto development and investment anchored in the country.
The Clarity Act is the product of years of lobbying by the crypto industry. Companies in the sector have argued that older laws do not fit digital assets well. They have said new legislation is needed so firms can work with legal certainty. Supporters of the bill say federal standards would reduce confusion across the market.
Bessent has made similar comments before. In February, he said the bill would give “great comfort to the market” during a period of volatility. He also said there is bipartisan support for passing the measure. That support could matter as lawmakers continue negotiations on the bill.
Stablecoin dispute continues to slow action
The legislation has faced months of delay because of a dispute over stablecoin provisions. Banks and crypto firms have disagreed on language tied to interest and other rewards. Banks have pushed for terms that would ban that practice. The disagreement has slowed progress on final approval.
That clash has kept the bill from moving ahead more quickly in Congress. The crypto industry has pressed for a framework that gives firms room to operate. Banking groups have sought tighter guardrails on payment products linked to digital tokens. Lawmakers have had to weigh both positions while trying to shape a final text.
Even with the delay, the bill has already cleared one major step. The House of Representatives passed its version of the legislation in July. That vote showed support for federal action on digital asset rules. It also kept pressure on Congress to resolve the remaining disputes.
Push for US-based crypto investment
Bessent’s argument rests on the idea that regulatory clarity could keep business in the United States. He said companies are more likely to build and invest where rules are known. He pointed to foreign markets that have already offered clearer paths for registration and compliance. That comparison has become a key part of the debate.
His latest comments place fresh focus on Congress at a time of continued market interest in crypto. Supporters of the bill say the United States risks losing firms without action. Critics remain focused on how the measure would treat stablecoins and related products. The next steps now depend on whether lawmakers can agree on the final rules.





