TLDR
- Boris Johnson, former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, labeled Bitcoin a “giant Ponzi scheme” in his Daily Mail opinion piece.
- The column featured an anecdote about a local resident who allegedly lost £20,000 (~$26,450) in what Johnson characterized as a Bitcoin-related fraud.
- Johnson challenged the credibility of trusting a financial system developed by the pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto.
- Michael Saylor, Strategy’s Executive Chairman, countered by explaining Bitcoin lacks the defining characteristics of a Ponzi scheme.
- Crypto advocates highlighted Bitcoin’s transparent code, capped supply, and decentralized nature as proof it doesn’t match Ponzi scheme criteria.
Boris Johnson, the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, ignited a fierce controversy within cryptocurrency circles after dubbing Bitcoin a “giant Ponzi scheme” in his newspaper opinion piece. Crypto advocates wasted no time mounting their defense.
On Friday, March 14, 2026, Johnson’s column appeared in the Daily Mail. The article began with an anecdote involving an Oxfordshire villager who allegedly gave £500 (~$661) to a stranger at a pub with promises of doubling the investment through Bitcoin.
According to Johnson’s account, this individual spent three and a half years attempting to recover his funds while paying various fees. The efforts proved futile. The total loss eventually reached approximately £20,000 (~$26,450), leaving the victim “struggling to pay his bills,” Johnson stated.
Leveraging this narrative, Johnson contended that Bitcoin lacks genuine intrinsic value. He drew comparisons to gold and surprisingly, Pokémon cards, arguing both possess either physical substance or cultural significance.
“These curious little Japanese cartoon beasties seem to exercise the same fascination over the five-year-old mind as they did 30 years ago,” Johnson remarked, implying Pokémon cards hold more trading value than Bitcoin.
Johnson further challenged the trustworthiness of a monetary system created by Satoshi Nakamoto, whose true identity remains one of cryptocurrency’s greatest mysteries.
“Who do we talk to if they decrypt the crypto?” Johnson posed in his piece.
Saylor’s Counterargument
The cryptocurrency community’s rebuttal arrived swiftly. Michael Saylor, serving as Executive Chairman of Strategy — which holds the largest corporate Bitcoin position globally — directly addressed Johnson’s assertions.
According to Saylor, legitimate Ponzi schemes depend on a “central operator promising returns and paying early investors with funds from later ones.” Bitcoin fails to satisfy these criteria.
“Bitcoin has no issuer, no promoter, and no guaranteed return — just an open, decentralized monetary network driven by code and market demand,” Saylor stated on X.
Pierre Rochard, who leads The Bitcoin Bond Company as CEO, joined the conversation by suggesting the United Kingdom itself operates as “a giant Ponzi scheme” sustained through debt accumulation.
X Community Notes and Digital Backlash
A community note appeared on Johnson’s X post, clarifying that Ponzi schemes typically guarantee artificially inflated returns with minimal risk. The annotation stated: “Bitcoin has no issuer and its value is purely determined by the free market. The code is totally public and opt-in.”
Numerous commenters referenced Bitcoin’s mathematically limited supply and publicly accessible source code as fundamental distinctions from conventional Ponzi operations.
When addressing Johnson’s query about Bitcoin’s leadership, BitMEX Research offered a straightforward response: “Nobody is in charge.”
Several users deployed memes while criticizing central banking authorities for monetary expansion policies implemented during the pandemic era.
This controversy unfolded during the same week Bitcoin’s network mined its 20 millionth coin, a significant achievement that emphasized Bitcoin’s mathematically enforced maximum supply of 21 million coins.





