TLDR
- Major European NATO members have declined participation in U.S. military operations in the Strait of Hormuz
- Germany and UK leadership describe the Iran situation as outside NATO’s defensive mandate
- Crude oil has surged past $100 per barrel following disruptions to strait traffic
- The European Union’s Aspides naval operation remains limited to its current Red Sea scope
- The former president warned of serious consequences for NATO if allies ignore his appeal
Military actions by the United States and Israel targeting Iran began on February 28. The critical Strait of Hormuz waterway, responsible for transporting approximately 20% of global oil supplies, has experienced significant disruption. Crude prices have climbed beyond the $100 per barrel threshold.
Over the weekend, Trump appealed to NATO partners to contribute naval assets for securing the strategic passage. The overwhelming response from European capitals was negative.
Johann Wadephul, Germany’s Foreign Minister, stated that Berlin would not participate in military action. Defence Minister Boris Pistorius delivered a blunt message: “This is not our war. We have not started it.”
A spokesman for German Chancellor Friedrich Merz emphasized that the situation has “nothing to do with NATO,” characterizing the alliance as “an alliance for the defence of territory.”
European Leaders Push Back
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer clarified that Strait of Hormuz operations were never conceived as a NATO initiative and affirmed the UK would “not be drawn into the wider war.” He noted ongoing discussions about deploying British mine-hunting drone technology already positioned in the area.
Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, and Lithuania voiced concerns about the proposal. Dutch Prime Minister Rob Jetten characterized launching such a mission as “very difficult to launch a successful mission there in the short term.”
Baltic nations Estonia and Lithuania indicated openness to reviewing the American request while seeking greater operational clarity. Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna posed a key question: “What will be the plan?”
Denmark’s top diplomat suggested Europe maintain an “open mind” regarding navigation freedom in the waterway, despite not supporting the U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran.
Poland indicated it would give serious consideration to any formal NATO channel request.
Oil Markets and Crypto React
Oil climbing above $100 per barrel has created turbulence in energy sectors. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas noted that strait disruptions benefit Russia’s Ukrainian war effort through elevated energy revenue.
The European Union’s Aspides operation, established in 2024 for protecting merchant vessels from Houthi threats in the Red Sea, remains unchanged in scope. Following consultations in Brussels, Kallas indicated there was “no appetite” for expansion.
France floated the possibility of broadening the Aspides mission and suggested it might contribute a naval vessel. Trump claimed French President Macron had indicated France’s willingness to provide assistance.
By Tuesday, Trump posted on Truth Social declaring the United States no longer required NATO assistance, stating “WE NEVER DID.” He announced that Secretary of State Marco Rubio would identify which countries are prepared to participate.
In a Financial Times interview, Trump cautioned that NATO confronts a “very bad” outlook if his request receives no meaningful response.




