After $1.2 Billion Yearly Revenue in Gaming, Gurhan Kiziloz Moves Into Blockchain

The blockchain industry has settled into a familiar pattern. Ethereum dominates smart contracts and decentralised applications. Solana offers speed for those willing to accept its trade-offs. Bitcoin remains the store of value. Newer entrants compete for whatever remains, most fading into obscurity within a year or two of launch. Gurhan Kiziloz entered this market with BlockDAG and a thesis that the established order is more fragile than it appears.

BlockDAG is built on a Directed Acyclic Graph architecture, a structure that allows transactions to be processed in parallel rather than sequentially. The result is throughput that rivals Solana without the validator centralisation that critics point to as a weakness. The blockchain retains Proof-of-Work consensus, distributing security across a broader base than Proof-of-Stake alternatives. It offers compatibility with Ethereum’s smart contract ecosystem, lowering the barrier for developers considering migration. The technical proposition is coherent: speed, security, and decentralisation without forcing users to choose between them.

Kiziloz did not enter blockchain as a technologist. He entered as an operator, someone who had already built a billion-dollar company in gaming and understood what it takes to scale in competitive markets. His net worth of $1.7 billion, accumulated through Nexus International, provided the capital to fund BlockDAG without outside investors. His experience building Spartans.com against Bet365 and Stake provided a template for challenging entrenched competitors. The approach he brought to blockchain was the same one that worked in gaming: move fast, execute cleanly, and let results answer sceptics.

The operational intensity at BlockDAG reflects that philosophy. When leadership did not meet Kiziloz’s expectations, changes were made. The CEO was replaced. Staff who could not maintain the required pace were let go. The restructuring was swift and unapologetic. Kiziloz identified what he believed was slowing progress and removed it. The organisation now operates with a team calibrated for speed.

This approach distinguishes BlockDAG from many blockchain projects, which often move slowly and prioritise community consensus over execution. Kiziloz has little patience for governance processes that delay decisions. He funds the development himself, sets the direction, and expects the team to deliver. The model is centralised in ways that may concern blockchain purists, but it produces momentum that decentralised governance structures struggle to match.

The competitive landscape BlockDAG is entering does not lack for capable opponents. Ethereum has years of network effects and a developer ecosystem that no competitor has replicated. Solana has institutional backing, brand recognition, and a track record of performance despite occasional network issues. Newer entrants like Aptos and Sui have raised significant capital and attracted technical talent. BlockDAG must differentiate itself not just on architecture but on execution and adoption.

Kiziloz’s response to this challenge is characteristically direct. He is targeting developers frustrated with Ethereum’s costs and Solana’s centralisation concerns. He is positioning BlockDAG as the blockchain that does not force compromises, fast enough for high-volume applications, decentralised enough to satisfy security concerns, compatible enough to make migration straightforward. The pitch is ambitious. Whether the market responds remains to be seen.

What Kiziloz brings to this effort is a track record that most blockchain founders lack. He has built at scale before. He has competed against entrenched operators and won meaningful market share. He has funded growth from his own resources without relying on venture capital or token sales to sustain development. These credentials do not guarantee success in blockchain, but they distinguish BlockDAG from projects led by founders with more vision than execution capability.

The blockchain industry has seen countless challenges to its established players. Most have failed. The technology was incomplete, the execution was poor, or the market simply was not ready for an alternative. BlockDAG may face the same fate. But it may also represent something different, a challenge backed by real capital, led by a proven operator, and built on architecture that addresses genuine limitations in existing networks.

Kiziloz has said he does not enter markets to participate. He enters to win. In gaming, that attitude produced a $1.2 billion in annual revenue. In blockchain, it has produced BlockDAG, a project that is either a serious threat to the status quo or an expensive lesson in the limits of operational intensity. The next few years will determine which.

The established players are watching. They would be unwise not to.

---

Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.