TLDR
- NFL urged the CFTC to strengthen sports prediction market rules before more event contracts expand.
- The league warned some sports contracts may closely resemble gaming products without tighter definitions today.
- NFL requested insider trading rules covering non-public information linked to teams and league operations now.
- The league also pushed for age limits, advertising curbs, and a margin trading ban proposal.
- CFTC rulemaking could decide how prediction platforms list sports contracts tied to major leagues nationwide.
The NFL has urged the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to tighten proposed rules for sports prediction markets, arguing that current draft rules need stronger safeguards for game integrity and consumers.
The league made the request in a July 27 letter to CFTC Chair Michael Selig, as federal regulators review how event contracts tied to sports should operate under derivatives rules.
NFL Seeks Stronger Event Contract Rules
The NFL said its main concern remains protecting the integrity of its games. A screenshot of the letter said, “The NFL’s highest priority is preserving the integrity of our games.”
The league said the CFTC’s proposed prediction market rulemaking includes some useful proposals. However, the NFL argued that the framework must be strengthened in several areas before sports event contracts expand further.
The letter focused on markets that the league believes may be vulnerable to manipulation. These include contracts tied to single-person decisions, discretionary officiating, or outcomes that some people may know before the public.
“The Commission must refine the proposed definition for contracts based on events that cannot be meaningfully differentiated from activities that are clearly gaming activity,” the NFL reportedly wrote.
League Raises Concerns Over Review Process
The NFL also questioned the CFTC’s proposed 10-day pre-approval process for event contracts. The league argued that the review period may be too short for contracts tied to complex sports outcomes.
The league also raised concern that the process could protect contracts already listed before regulators complete a deeper review. That concern applies to markets that may appear closer to sports betting than financial risk contracts.
The NFL pointed to award markets, including “Offensive Player of the Year,” as another area needing review. The CFTC has considered allowing such contracts because they involve voting panels rather than direct game outcomes.
The league’s position differs from some other major sports bodies. The NHL and Major League Baseball have partnered with prediction market platforms, including Kalshi and Polymarket, while the NFL has pushed for tighter limits.
Age Limits and Advertising Rules Requested
The NFL asked regulators to add clearer insider trading rules for sports prediction markets. The league wants explicit limits on the use of material non-public information by people connected to teams, players, or league operations.
The league also recommended mandatory “league-specific prohibited bettor” lists. That approach would restrict certain insiders instead of relying only on platforms to police user activity.
The letter repeated earlier requests for consumer protections. These include a margin trading ban, advertising restrictions, and other rules aimed at protecting game integrity.
The NFL also supported an age limit of 21 for sports prediction markets. The league said stronger oversight would help separate regulated event contracts from gaming-style products.
The CFTC has moved toward clearer rules for prediction markets after withdrawing a 2024 proposal that would have banned sports and political event contracts. Under Selig, the agency has treated prediction markets as legitimate derivatives while defending federal oversight in court.
The NFL’s latest letter shows that sports leagues remain divided over how far these markets should expand. The CFTC’s final rulemaking could shape how platforms list sports contracts and how leagues protect sensitive information.





