Key Takeaways
- Galaxy Research’s Alex Thorn lowered CLARITY Act passage probability from 60% to 50% for 2026
- Legislation cleared Senate Banking Committee 15-9 on May 14 but lacks scheduled floor debate
- Limited Senate floor availability before late July August recess creates timing pressure
- Democratic senators’ ethics provision requirements still await resolution
- Absence of July timetable could delay passage until post-September timeframe
The CLARITY Act, a legislative proposal addressing cryptocurrency market structure, secured Senate Banking Committee approval on May 14 with a bipartisan 15-9 vote. However, Galaxy Research analyst Alex Thorn recently downgraded his forecast for the bill’s 2026 enactment from 60% to 50%.
Currently positioned at slot 423 on the Senate’s legislative calendar, the legislation awaits scheduling for floor consideration.
The fundamental challenge facing the bill is calendar availability. With the Senate’s August recess commencing at July’s end, only a handful of productive legislative weeks remain available.
Competing Priorities Consume Senate Schedule
Recent Senate proceedings lost an entire week to debates surrounding an anti-weaponization funding measure. Additionally, the chamber unsuccessfully attempted to advance FISA Section 702 reauthorization, with a procedural motion falling 47-52.
Section 702 expires June 12, meaning substantial floor time in the upcoming week will address that expiration rather than cryptocurrency-related legislation.
While individual delays appear minor, collectively they erode the limited timeframe the CLARITY Act requires for advancement.
For successful passage, Senate Majority Leader John Thune must allocate July floor time. The legislation still requires floor deliberation, an amendment process, and harmonization with Senate Agriculture Committee language before any House consideration.
This represents a substantial procedural checklist with minimal calendar capacity to accommodate it.
Democratic Support Remains Uncertain
Beyond scheduling constraints, a significant policy matter persists. Senate Democrats, including Ruben Gallego, have indicated ethics provisions constitute a mandatory requirement for their support. These provisions remain unaddressed after the committee deferred resolution to floor consideration.
The legislation requires at least 60 votes for advancement. Galaxy Research anticipates two Republican opposition votes from Josh Hawley and Rand Paul, both having opposed last year’s GENIUS Act.
This arithmetic provides Thune minimal incentive to schedule floor debate without confirmed Democratic backing.
Factors That Could Improve Outlook
Thorn indicated he would increase probability estimates if Thune publicly commits to early-to-mid July floor time and if ethics and illicit finance concerns are demonstrably addressed with confirmation of nine or more Democratic votes.
Announcement that Banking and Agriculture Committee versions have been consolidated into unified legislation would also strengthen prospects.
Absent these developments within the next two to three weeks, Galaxy Research suggests the viable pathway shifts to September. However, autumn consideration encounters midterm election pressures, when floor availability diminishes and legislators prioritize campaign activities.
Currently, Galaxy Research maintains the CLARITY Act remains more probable than not to pass in 2026, though the confidence margin continues narrowing.





