TLDR
- Blue Owl Capital’s two main private-credit funds faced $5.4 billion in withdrawal requests during Q1 2026.
- The Credit Income fund saw redemption requests totaling 21.9% of its $36B assets, while the tech-focused fund faced 40.7% of its $3B portfolio.
- The firm is limiting quarterly withdrawals to 5%, in accordance with existing fund agreements.
- Shares of OWL declined 5.4% to $8.24 on Thursday, extending year-to-date losses beyond 40%.
- The private credit industry has experienced over $11B in capital outflows across the last two quarters, affecting competitors like Ares Management.
Blue Owl Capital (OWL) shares traded at $8.24 on Thursday, reflecting a 5.4% decline, following the company’s announcement of substantial investor redemption demands across its two primary private-credit investment vehicles.
The shares had already retreated 4.6% during Wednesday’s session, bringing total year-to-date losses to over 40% — positioning it among the worst-performing publicly listed alternative investment managers.
Withdrawal requests totaling $5.4 billion flooded Blue Owl Credit Income Corp. and Blue Owl Technology Income Corp. (OTIC) throughout the first quarter of 2026. These redemption demands account for 21.9% of Credit Income’s $36 billion asset base and a striking 40.7% of OTIC’s approximately $3 billion in net assets.
Both investment vehicles are enforcing a 5% quarterly redemption ceiling on total assets — a restriction established in the original fund documentation when investors made their initial capital commitments. Based on this limitation, Credit Income will process roughly $988 million in redemptions, while OTIC will return $179 million to exiting investors.
Despite the outflow pressure, new capital continues entering both funds. Credit Income attracted $872 million in fresh investments, resulting in a net capital outflow of $116 million. OTIC secured $127 million in new commitments, producing a net outflow of approximately $52 million, representing roughly 2% of its total net asset value.
According to Blue Owl, Credit Income maintains $11.3 billion in liquid resources, including cash holdings, available credit facilities, and marketable investments — sufficient to handle at least two years of quarterly redemptions at the 5% threshold without liquidating any loan positions.
Why Investors Are Pulling Back
The redemption wave has been intensifying over recent months. Growing anxieties about potential corporate loan defaults, excessive lending exposure to software sector companies, and concerns that artificial intelligence could disrupt traditional software business models have collectively driven a sentiment shift.
OTIC’s investment portfolio maintains heavy concentration in loans extended to software firms acquired through leveraged buyouts. Blue Owl has challenged the pessimistic narrative, emphasizing that its software borrowers provide essential products, demonstrating 10% revenue expansion and 14% growth in cash operating profits. The fund has generated a 9.6% annualized return since launching in 2022.
Credit Income’s underlying loan recipients are similarly performing well, according to the firm, posting 9% revenue growth alongside 10% cash operating income expansion. Non-performing loans remain minimal. The fund has produced a 9.2% return since its inception.
“We continue to observe a meaningful disconnect between the public dialogue on private credit and the underlying trends in our portfolio,” wrote Blue Owl’s Craig Packer and Eric Bissonnette.
Sector-Wide Pressure
Blue Owl isn’t experiencing this pressure in isolation. Ares Management (ARES) dropped 4.6% Thursday to $100.86. The broader private credit sector has witnessed more than $11 billion in capital withdrawals over the preceding two quarters.
Various fund managers are adopting different strategies for handling redemptions. Blackstone and Cliffwater have processed 7%–8% redemptions to demonstrate portfolio confidence. Apollo, Ares, and BlackRock have maintained adherence to the 5% quarterly ceiling.
Meanwhile, Saba Capital’s founder Boaz Weinstein proposed an offer in February to acquire Blue Owl fund investor positions at 65%–80% of net asset value — highlighting the dramatic shift in market sentiment.
The broader regulatory environment adds additional complexity: the Trump administration alongside various investment firms have advocated for incorporating private credit into 401(k) retirement plans. The Treasury Department convened a Wednesday meeting with regulatory agencies to examine risks within the sector.
Blue Owl’s first quarter 2026 disclosure, published Thursday, revealed Credit Income secured $872 million in new capital commitments against $988 million in processed redemptions, producing a net quarterly outflow of $116 million.





