TLDR
- Paul Atkins said the SEC has used its authority to harm crypto industry growth.
- Hester Peirce called for rethinking how financial transactions are surveilled.
- Lawmakers are still debating the CLARITY Act to define crypto market structure.
- The SEC’s crypto task force has hosted six policy events since January.
As U.S. regulators reassess their approach to cryptocurrency, recent statements from SEC Chair Paul Atkins and Commissioner Hester Peirce are drawing attention. Both officials called for more balanced oversight, with Atkins criticizing past enforcement practices and Peirce urging a review of financial surveillance methods. Their remarks suggest a possible shift in regulatory tone, offering the crypto industry hope for clearer guidance and a more cooperative path forward.
Top Officials Acknowledge Past Overreach in Crypto Enforcement
SEC Chair Paul Atkins stated that crypto’s time has arrived and criticized how the agency previously handled enforcement. He said, “For too long the SEC has weaponized its authority to subvert the crypto industry.” His remarks have sparked renewed discussion about the future of digital asset regulation.
Atkins also expressed concern that enforcement actions have slowed innovation. He suggested that regulators should guide projects instead of blocking them. His comments echoed growing concerns from within the crypto community about the SEC’s current enforcement-heavy stance.
Peirce Calls for Review of Financial Surveillance Practices
Commissioner Hester Peirce supported Atkins’ view and focused on surveillance concerns. She said regulators should “rethink when and how financial transactions are surveilled” as blockchain-based finance expands. Peirce emphasized the growing demand for privacy in the digital space.
She noted that public blockchains are viewable by anyone, which could risk user privacy. At the same time, she acknowledged that some transparency can benefit regulators. She said crypto “opens new possibilities for transactions without financial intermediaries,” challenging traditional surveillance frameworks.
Peirce made these remarks during a roundtable discussion on surveillance and privacy. This was the sixth meeting held by the SEC’s crypto policy group, launched by her in January. The event included participants from Zcash, the Blockchain Association, and the Crypto Council for Innovation.
Market Structure Legislation Faces Time Pressure in Congress
Lawmakers are still working to pass a market structure bill that would clarify oversight responsibilities between agencies. The CLARITY Act, passed in the House in July, is still awaiting Senate action. The bill could expand the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s authority over digital assets.
The Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees have released their versions of the bill. However, no markup hearings are scheduled, and the Senate is preparing to recess for the holidays. Republican leaders are pushing for a vote, but passage before 2026 appears uncertain.
If passed, the legislation would redefine how crypto assets are classified and regulated in the U.S., shifting some authority away from the SEC.
Industry Eyes Signs of More Cooperative Oversight
Many in the crypto sector see the statements from Atkins and Peirce as early signs of a new direction. There is growing hope that regulators will focus more on protecting investors without stifling growth.
Atkins said, “Regulation should not crush innovation.” He urged the SEC to adopt approaches that promote both safety and development. A more open relationship between regulators and crypto firms could attract more startups and institutional players into the space.
While these words are seen as progress, industry leaders say regulatory change will only come through formal rulemaking and legislative clarity. Until then, the industry continues to push for updated guidelines and clearer policies.





