TLDR
- Grayscale’s Zcash ETF uses cash creation, not in-kind redemptions at launch.
- ETF custody handled by Coinbase enforces transparent, auditable holdings.
- Shielded ZEC transactions are not supported due to regulatory constraints.
- The ETF offers price exposure to ZEC, not actual private transaction utility.
Zcash, once known for its advanced privacy features using zero-knowledge proofs, is now entering a new phase through Wall Street’s lens. Grayscale’s proposed ZEC ETF brings the coin into the regulated financial world, but not without trade-offs. The fund offers exposure to Zcash’s price, not its privacy. As the ETF avoids shielded transactions, it raises questions about whether regulated privacy is possible—or just privacy in name only.
ETF Brings Zcash to Wall Street Under Strict Compliance
Grayscale has filed to list a Zcash (ZEC) exchange-traded fund (ETF) on NYSE Arca under the ticker ZCSH. This marks the first attempt to bring a privacy-focused cryptocurrency into the framework of regulated investment products in the United States.
The ETF, if approved, will use a cash creation model. That means authorized participants will deposit U.S. dollars rather than cryptocurrency to receive ETF shares. Grayscale will then use those dollars to purchase ZEC from the open market and hold it with Coinbase Custody. This model avoids direct interaction with Zcash’s shielded transactions, which are difficult to audit and verify.
Grayscale’s S-3 filing outlines this model and includes provisions for potential in-kind redemptions. However, in-kind activity will only proceed if NYSE Arca’s rule change request is approved. Even then, regulatory and compliance concerns will limit use of Zcash’s privacy features in the ETF.
Privacy Features Restricted by ETF Design
Zcash offers optional privacy through two types of addresses: transparent and shielded. Shielded addresses allow users to send and receive funds without revealing transaction details. However, the ETF infrastructure will not support these shielded features due to audit and sanctions-screening requirements.
Instead, all ZEC within the ETF will likely be held in transparent form. Coinbase Custody enforces strict address whitelisting, which aligns with broader institutional compliance needs. This ensures all assets are traceable, documented, and auditable for regulatory and tax purposes.
“Transparency is essential in our custody model,” said a spokesperson from Coinbase Custody. “We apply robust monitoring, including OFAC screening, for all transactions.”
Price Exposure Without Privacy Utility
The ETF gives investors price exposure to ZEC without offering the ability to engage in private Zcash transactions. This means it caters to institutional and retail investors who want access to Zcash’s price movements without interacting with shielded wallets, managing private keys, or facing compliance challenges.
The surge in ZEC price from $29 in March to over $700 by November has drawn renewed attention to privacy-focused coins. Yet most on-exchange ZEC activity still occurs via transparent addresses. This trend aligns with the ETF’s structure, which emphasizes traceability and operational clarity over discretionary privacy.
For Grayscale, the transparent nature of most ZEC transactions makes Zcash suitable for a regulated investment vehicle. In contrast, coins like Monero, which do not offer optional transparency, remain unsuitable for such funds due to regulatory restrictions.
Investor Interest Drives Compliance-Centric Offering
The ZCSH ETF is not designed for privacy users but for those interested in privacy as a narrative or investment thesis. Hedge funds may view the ETF as a speculative vehicle, while retail traders benefit from a simplified way to access ZEC without touching exchanges that restrict shielded withdrawals.
According to market analysts, this ETF format allows compliance-safe exposure to a category of assets associated with privacy. However, it does not enable the privacy features that make such coins unique.
“The ETF normalizes Zcash as an investable asset, not a private medium of exchange,” said an anonymous financial analyst.
While the product does not use shielded transactions, it packages privacy as a thematic investment. This shift reflects a growing demand for structured exposure to crypto narratives, even when the core use case is reduced to a market price.





