TLDR
- Denmark halts Chat Control plan that aimed to scan messages before encryption.
- Signal, WhatsApp, and Telegram users will keep end-to-end encrypted chats.
- Germany and tech groups opposed the mandatory scanning policy strongly.
- Crypto traders benefit as private financial chats remain secure in the EU.
Denmark has withdrawn its proposed “Chat Control” plan after strong criticism from privacy groups, tech experts, and EU member states. The plan would have required apps like WhatsApp, Signal, and Telegram to scan users’ private messages before encryption. Officials said the goal was to fight online child abuse. However, concerns over user privacy, surveillance risks, and encryption weaknesses forced the government to step back from the mandate.
Controversial Proposal Faced Wide Opposition
The Chat Control proposal was part of a broader EU effort to address child sexual abuse online. It called for mandatory client-side scanning on messaging platforms. This process would have required apps to check messages for illegal content before they were encrypted.
The Danish government said the proposal aimed to protect children and help law enforcement respond faster to abuse cases. Justice Minister Peter Hummelgaard supported the move and described it as necessary for public safety. However, the reaction from digital rights groups, cybersecurity experts, and several countries was swift and critical.
Germany publicly opposed the plan, warning that it could weaken encryption and lead to mass surveillance. Other EU nations also raised concerns, and many technology companies warned they might stop operating in the region if the rule passed. Without enough support from key partners, Denmark’s position in EU discussions became less sustainable.
Encryption and User Privacy Concerns
Critics said client-side scanning would break end-to-end encryption, a key feature that protects message privacy. Once this type of scanning is built into apps, security experts warned that it could be misused by hackers or governments.
Messaging services such as Signal, Telegram, and WhatsApp said the proposal could not be implemented without risking user safety. They said any backdoor in the encryption process would make all users vulnerable. “There is no way to scan messages without breaking encryption for everyone,” Signal President Meredith Whittaker said during the early stages of the debate.
Many users also feared their personal messages, including financial and health-related conversations, could become accessible. Privacy campaigners said the scanning technology could be expanded beyond abuse detection to other areas, raising broader civil rights concerns.
Crypto Users and Secure Messaging
The crypto community closely followed the debate. Many crypto traders use secure messaging apps like Telegram and Signal to share wallet details, trading information, and private group updates. Any weakening of encryption could have made that data open to monitoring or theft.
With Denmark stepping back from the plan, crypto users in the EU can continue using these apps without concern over forced scanning. Industry experts said the proposal would have created risks for anyone handling sensitive financial data. Messaging platforms now have fewer legal pressures to change how they handle encryption.
The tech industry welcomed Denmark’s decision. Major platforms expressed support for fighting child abuse but said it must not come at the cost of secure communication.
Future of EU Policy on Child Safety and Privacy
Although the Danish government has withdrawn support for mandatory scanning, the issue is not closed. Denmark will hold the EU Council presidency until mid-2026, giving it a leading role in future negotiations.
Justice Minister Hummelgaard confirmed the government will now support a voluntary system. Under this model, messaging apps can choose to scan for harmful content, but they will not be required by law to do so.
EU lawmakers are expected to review new proposals in the coming months. Discussions may focus on improving reporting tools and supporting law enforcement without forcing changes to encryption. Privacy organizations will continue to monitor the policy process and push for stronger protections.





