‘$100 Billion is the Real Turning Point’: Gurhan Kiziloz on Nexus International’s $1.2bn Annual Revenue

When Gurhan Kiziloz was asked what his $1.7 billion net worth represents to him, his answer surprised the interviewer. Most founders at that level offer something about legacy, impact, or the validation of years of work. Kiziloz offered arithmetic. The figure doesn’t represent much, he explained, because most of it isn’t cash. When it becomes liquid, then it will mean something. Until then, it remains an abstraction, a number on a ledger rather than a reality he experiences day to day.

The response reveals something about how Kiziloz relates to achievement. He does not appear to experience milestones the way most entrepreneurs do. Nexus International generated $1.2 billion in revenue in 2025, a figure that would prompt celebration, or at least acknowledgment, at most companies. When asked whether this marked a turning point for the business, Kiziloz dismissed the premise. The turning point, he said, would come at $100 billion. That is where Nexus is heading. The $1.2 billion is simply where it happens to be now.

There is a version of this disposition that shades into pathology, the founder who cannot enjoy success, who treats every achievement as inadequate, who exhausts themselves and their organisations chasing horizons that perpetually recede. Kiziloz may yet prove to be that founder. The evidence so far suggests something different: not dissatisfaction with what has been built, but genuine orientation toward what remains to be built. The distinction matters. One is driven by inadequacy, the other by appetite. The outcomes can look similar from the outside while feeling entirely different from within.

The practical consequences of this orientation are visible in how Nexus operates. Companies that have reached significant scale often shift into preservation mode. The intensity that characterised the growth phase gives way to process, governance, risk management. The organisation becomes concerned with protecting what exists rather than creating what doesn’t yet. Nexus has not made this shift. The operational tempo remains what it was when the company was smaller. Decisions still move quickly. Accountability remains immediate. The expectations Kiziloz sets have not softened to accommodate the comfort that success might otherwise provide.

His decision to enter blockchain while continuing to scale Nexus illustrates the point. BlockDAG was not a pivot away from gaming or a hedge against its decline. It was an expansion into additional territory, pursued simultaneously with continued growth in the core business. A founder oriented toward consolidation would not have made this choice. The risk of distraction alone would have counselled against it. Kiziloz proceeded anyway, apparently confident that his capacity for building had not been exhausted by what he had already built.

The ambition he has articulated, reaching the top ten of global billionaires, provides context for understanding these choices. The goal is specific enough to be measurable and distant enough to require sustained effort over many years. It functions as a direction of travel rather than a defined endpoint. Whether Kiziloz actually reaches it matters less than what pursuing it produces: continued intensity, continued expansion, continued refusal to regard any particular milestone as sufficient.

This raises questions about sustainability. Founders who operate at high intensity for extended periods sometimes discover that the intensity itself becomes the constraint. The organisation adapts to the founder’s pace until the founder can no longer maintain it, at which point the mismatch creates problems that were not visible when momentum was high. Kiziloz has maintained his approach through the growth from modest beginnings to $1.2 billion in revenue.

What can be observed is that the pattern has held thus far. The $1.7 billion net worth has not changed how Kiziloz operates. The $1.2 billion in revenue has not prompted a shift toward preservation. The forward orientation that characterised earlier stages remains intact, now backed by resources that make larger ambitions feasible. The founder who spoke about $100 billion as a turning point was not engaging in rhetorical excess. He was describing, as accurately as he could, how he actually thinks about where he is and where he intends to go.

Most entrepreneurs, upon reaching $1.7 billion in net worth, would consider their position established. They might continue building, but with a different relationship to the outcome, less urgency, more patience, a recognition that enough has been achieved to constitute success by any reasonable definition. Kiziloz appears to operate without this recognition. The definition of success he carries remains ahead of him, not behind. The $1.7 billion is not evidence of arrival. It is evidence of progress toward something larger.

Whether that something larger will be reached is unknowable. What is observable is a founder who has constructed his psychology around the pursuit rather than the achievement, and who shows no indication of reconstructing it now that conventional measures of success have been met.

---

Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.