Key Takeaways
High Court confirms Block Earner’s Earner product required proper licensing
ASIC secures victory in landmark crypto regulatory appeal
Full Federal Court to determine penalties in next phase
Ruling establishes crypto yield service as financial product under law
Company now focuses on Bitcoin-collateralized mortgage products
In a significant regulatory victory, Australia’s highest court has sided with the securities regulator in a pivotal crypto licensing case. The High Court determined that Block Earner’s discontinued crypto yield service required proper financial services authorization. The matter of sanctions will now proceed to the Full Federal Court for consideration.
Unanimous decision reverses earlier ruling
The seven-judge panel delivered a unanimous verdict that overturned a previous Full Federal Court outcome favoring the crypto company. Web3 Ventures Pty Ltd, which operates Block Earner, previously offered the Earner yield service. ASIC maintained that the offering constituted a regulated financial product under existing legislation.
The nation’s top court determined that Earner functioned as an investment facility under legal definitions. Additionally, judges concluded the product qualified as a derivative instrument. The court noted that investor returns fluctuated based on cryptocurrency valuations and foreign exchange movements.
This determination bolstered the regulator’s position that proper Australian financial services authorization was mandatory. ASIC emphasized that the absence of licensing left customers without essential regulatory safeguards. The case will now proceed to the Full Federal Court to address penalty considerations.
Legal battle provides clarity on crypto oversight
The securities watchdog initiated civil penalty action against Block Earner in November 2022. Regulators focused on the Earner service because the firm marketed it without necessary authorization. The company discontinued the product during the same month.
In February 2024, the Federal Court determined Block Earner operated an unauthorized managed investment scheme. Despite this finding, the court granted penalty relief to the company in June 2024. The regulator appealed this leniency, while Block Earner filed a counter-appeal the following month.
The Full Federal Court sided with Block Earner’s counter-appeal in April 2025. It simultaneously rejected the regulator’s penalty challenge at that juncture. The High Court has now overturned those determinations and reinstated the regulator’s pursuit of sanctions.
Firm pivots to cryptocurrency-backed mortgage services
Block Earner has transitioned away from offering fixed-return cryptocurrency products. The firm secured an Australian Credit Licence in May 2026. Subsequently, the company unveiled intentions to launch cryptocurrency-collateralized mortgage offerings.
The planned service would enable customers to pledge Bitcoin as security for residential financing. This approach allows cryptocurrency holders to obtain capital without liquidating their digital assets. The licensing approval represented a significant development for digital asset-backed credit products in Australia.
Nevertheless, the High Court’s ruling strengthens the regulator’s authority over cryptocurrency product supervision. The judgment establishes that existing financial laws apply to digital asset offerings when they satisfy regulatory definitions. Consequently, cryptocurrency enterprises face increased licensing obligations under the nation’s current regulatory structure.





