Key Points
New York court suspends proceedings involving 39,069 inactive Bitcoin wallets
Default judgment attempt prevented in Bitcoin wallet ownership case
Scheduled July hearing will examine validity of Bitcoin wallet claims
Independent legal expert contests ownership claims through amicus brief
Court puts hold on lawsuit involving $293B worth of Bitcoin addresses
A judicial authority in New York has issued a stay on legal proceedings concerning 39,069 inactive Bitcoin wallets, preventing any default ruling before a scheduled July court session. The litigation attempts to establish legal control over these Bitcoin addresses using New York’s abandoned property laws. The temporary suspension provides additional opportunity for challengers to contest the ownership assertions.
Court Issues Stay on Legal Proceedings
Justice Kathy J. King issued the order to show cause on June 4. The document was officially filed in court records on June 5. The order suspends all additional proceedings related to the plaintiffs’ request for declaratory judgment.
Additionally, the judicial order prevents any inquest or default ruling prior to oral arguments. The court session is scheduled for July 14 at New York County Supreme Court. The parties bringing the suit cannot move forward with their ownership claim until that date.
King additionally struck standard provisions that would have extended the suspension past the hearing date. Consequently, the stay remains effective only until the planned court appearance. A separate judicial decision also dismissed an earlier motion for injunctive relief as moot.
Legal Action Centers on Inactive Bitcoin Addresses
The litigation identifies ABC Company, XYZ Company, and Noah Doe as the parties bringing suit. It targets John Doe defendants associated with 39,069 inactive Bitcoin addresses. The claimants pursue ownership rights under New York Personal Property Law Article 7-B.
The legal filing asserts Noah Doe employed a specialized algorithm to locate abandoned addresses. It further states he submitted the wallet information to the NYPD across multiple submissions. Subsequently, blockchain notifications were transmitted to numerous addresses via OP_RETURN transactions.
The legal argument characterizes dormant Bitcoin wallets as abandoned property following non-response. Nevertheless, this legal strategy remains unproven for digital blockchain assets in New York courts. The litigation additionally encompasses addresses publicly connected to significant moments in Bitcoin’s history.
Independent Attorney Opposes Ownership Claims
Ian R. Cohen, a New York legal practitioner and Bitcoin owner, petitioned to participate as amicus curiae. He has no affiliation with any litigant in the case. His submitted brief contests the plaintiffs’ application of abandoned property statutes.
Cohen contends the law applies to physical property possessed by a discoverer. He maintains blockchain addresses don’t satisfy that legal framework. He further contends algorithmic identification doesn’t constitute physical property discovery.
The legal document also emphasizes control and ownership complications. It notes dormant Bitcoin wallets may still be under the control of legitimate owners possessing private keys. Thus, lack of response or activity doesn’t establish abandonment.
Galaxy Research previously calculated the identified addresses contained approximately 3.8 million BTC. That quantity reached roughly $293.5 billion based on May valuations. However, the legal complaint assessed each wallet under $10 because of recovery uncertainties.
The submission also expressed concerns regarding addresses connected to Mt. Gox and early Satoshi-era mining operations. These connections might generate disputes with additional legal and historical ownership assertions. Currently, the July 14 court session will determine subsequent proceedings.





