TLDR
- JPMorgan estimates Strategy may buy $30 billion in Bitcoin during 2026 if issuance stays open.
- Strategy’s preferred share channel can stop quickly when STRC trades below its $100 par target.
- The company’s buying pace could absorb more Bitcoin than miners create after the halving daily.
- A weaker Bitcoin price may pressure MSTR premiums and reduce Strategy’s ability to raise funds.
- ETF demand is spread across issuers, while Strategy concentrates demand inside one corporate structure today.
JPMorgan’s reported $30 billion Strategy call has placed Bitcoin’s market structure under fresh review. The note suggests Michael Saylor’s company could remain a major BTC buyer in 2026. Yet the same buying model creates a clear market fault line.
JPMorgan Sees Strategy as a Major Bitcoin Buyer
JPMorgan’s May 7 client note estimated Strategy “could buy roughly $30 billion in Bitcoin in 2026.” That pace would turn the company into a steady source of BTC demand. The estimate depends on Strategy keeping its stock and preferred share sales open.
Strategy held 818,869 BTC, bought for $61.86 billion at an average cost of $75,540. Bitcoin traded near $79,373 in the report, which placed the holding above its cost. The company also had $45.81 billion of remaining MSTR and STRC issuance capacity.
At the stated pace, Strategy could buy about 1,036 BTC each day. That amount is more than twice Bitcoin’s post-halving daily new supply of about 450 BTC. Therefore, JPMorgan’s call links Bitcoin demand to one company’s access to public markets.
At $30 billion, annual purchases would total about 378,000 BTC at the cited price. That would equal about 2.3 times post-halving annual issuance. It would also equal roughly 51% of cumulative US spot Bitcoin ETF net inflows.
Funding Loop Relies on MSTR and STRC Demand
Strategy raises cash through MSTR stock and STRC preferred shares. It then uses the proceeds to buy more Bitcoin. The company seeks BTC-per-share growth, and that can support more investor demand.
STRC was designed to trade near its $100 par value. When STRC trades at or above par, Strategy can sell more shares without dilution pressure. However, the channel narrows when STRC drops below that level.
K33 noted that STRC-linked purchases reached 46,872 BTC in April. When STRC slipped below par, the same channel nearly stopped for one reported week. Strategy bought only 535 BTC between May 4 and May 10.
The funding model also carries an annual cash cost. At $8.54 billion in STRC notional, an 11.50% dividend equals about $982 million per year. That cost would be equal to about 12,370 BTC at the cited Bitcoin price.
Bitcoin Fault Line Sits in Market Concentration
Spot Bitcoin ETFs spread demand across many issuers, traders, and investor groups. Strategy places a large corporate BTC bid inside one balance sheet. That difference matters because MSTR and STRC prices guide its buying power.
US spot Bitcoin ETFs held about 1.33 million BTC in the cited data. Strategy’s 818,869 BTC equaled about 62% of that ETF total. This figure places its funding access near the center of the debate.
The bullish case depends on Bitcoin prices, MSTR premiums, and STRC demand staying firm. Citi’s bullish BTC case pointed to $165,000 under better liquidity and steady institutional demand. In that setting, Strategy’s buying could act as a recurring market bid.
The weaker case starts when Bitcoin moves toward Strategy’s $75,540 average cost. That could pressure MSTR’s premium and push STRC below par. Then the company may lose the funding channel that helped absorb new BTC supply.
Citi’s adverse case placed Bitcoin at $58,000, below Strategy’s average cost. At that price, the market floor story would face a sharper test. JPMorgan’s $30 billion call therefore exposes a Bitcoin fault line between demand and funding.





