TLDR
- Elon Musk spent almost three full days testifying that OpenAI founders deceived him regarding a $38 million donation before the nonprofit transitioned to for-profit status
- The billionaire demands Sam Altman and Greg Brockman’s dismissal alongside potential damages reaching $180 billion
- A 2017 personal journal entry by Brockman indicates early conversations among founders about adopting a for-profit model
- Just 48 hours before proceedings commenced, Musk attempted settlement talks and cautioned that Altman and Brockman would become America’s “most hated men”
- Musk conceded that xAI utilized partial distillation from rival AI firms’ models, possibly including OpenAI’s technology
The legal confrontation between Elon Musk and OpenAI has progressed into week two, with additional crucial testimony anticipated at the Oakland, California courthouse.
Greg Brockman, serving as OpenAI’s President, is scheduled to deliver his testimony on Monday. His appearance follows Musk’s extended time in the witness box, which consumed approximately three full days during the previous week.
According to Musk’s allegations, his $38 million contribution to OpenAI was made under the assumption the organization would maintain its nonprofit designation. The Tesla CEO asserts that both Altman and Brockman engaged in deceptive practices while covertly developing plans to restructure the entity as a for-profit venture.
The billionaire entrepreneur has presented three primary demands to the court: the termination of both Altman and Brockman from their executive positions, financial compensation potentially totaling $180 billion, and the unwinding of OpenAI’s transformation into a for-profit corporation.
Recently disclosed court documents show that Musk contacted Brockman merely 48 hours prior to trial commencement attempting to negotiate a settlement. After Brockman proposed mutual withdrawal of all claims, Musk purportedly responded with a stark warning: “By the end of this week, you and Sam will be the most hated men in America.”
Private Journal Entries Take Center Stage
Legal representatives for Musk plan to leverage Brockman’s private diary writings as evidence against him. A particular 2017 notation allegedly contains the phrase, “We’ve been thinking that maybe we should just flip to a for profit. Making the money for us sounds great and all.”
In his videotaped deposition, Brockman maintained that this passage referenced developing sustainable revenue strategies to advance OpenAI’s core objectives, rather than pursuing individual financial enrichment.
Court proceedings further disclosed that during 2017, Musk directed his associate Jared Birchall to prepare incorporation documentation establishing a for-profit iteration of OpenAI. Musk characterized this action as a precautionary measure that ultimately went unused.
Text message evidence presented during proceedings revealed communication from Shivon Zilis, a former OpenAI board member, to Birchall stating: “Heads up. Seems like Greg, Ilya, Elon a go on for-profit.”
AI Company Rankings and Distillation Disclosure
While providing testimony, Musk spontaneously evaluated leading artificial intelligence organizations. His unsolicited ranking positioned Anthropic at the top, followed by OpenAI in second place, Google claiming third position, Chinese open-source platforms fourth, and his own xAI venture in fifth place.
The entrepreneur further confirmed that xAI had engaged in “partial” distillation practices involving competing AI companies’ models—a technique whereby one artificial intelligence system acquires knowledge through extensive querying of another system.
Musk characterized xAI as a “very small company,” estimating its size at approximately one-tenth that of OpenAI. SpaceX completed acquisition of xAI during February.
Additional witnesses anticipated to appear as the trial progresses include Sam Altman, Microsoft’s CEO Satya Nadella, former OpenAI Chief Technology Officer Mira Murati, and co-founder Ilya Sutskever.
Proceedings launched on April 28 under the jurisdiction of U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, with expectations that the case will extend across multiple weeks and potentially conclude with a verdict around mid-May.





