Key Takeaways
- Wisconsin becomes the fifth state targeted by CFTC legal action this month regarding prediction market oversight.
- Last week, Wisconsin initiated litigation against Kalshi, Polymarket, Crypto.com, Robinhood, and Coinbase, alleging they operate as unlicensed gambling platforms.
- According to CFTC Chairman Michael Selig, federal law grants the agency “exclusive jurisdiction” over event contracts in prediction markets.
- Similar lawsuits have been filed by the CFTC against New York, Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois throughout the month.
- An Arizona court has temporarily halted criminal proceedings against Kalshi, indicating federal statutes may take precedence over state gaming regulations.
On Tuesday, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission initiated legal proceedings against Wisconsin following the state’s pursuit of five prediction market operators accused of conducting unlicensed gambling activities. The federal regulator maintains that state-level legislation does not govern these operations.
Last Thursday, Wisconsin launched litigation targeting Kalshi, Polymarket, Crypto.com, Robinhood, and Coinbase. State officials contended that prediction platforms facilitating sports-related event wagering violate Wisconsin’s gambling statutes.
The CFTC’s response was swift and decisive. Together with the Justice Department’s Civil Division, the agency submitted its complaint to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
This marks the CFTC’s fifth state-level lawsuit in the current month concerning prediction market authority. Previous litigation targeted New York, Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois.
Driving these legal challenges is CFTC Chairman Michael Selig, who currently serves as the only member of what should be a five-commissioner panel.
In a public statement, Selig declared: “States cannot circumvent the clear directive of Congress. Our message to Wisconsin is the same as to New York, Arizona, and others: if you interfere with the operation of federal law in regulating financial markets, we will sue you.”
The CFTC’s position characterizes prediction markets as derivative instruments. According to the agency, these financial products belong under federal supervision as designated contract markets rather than state gambling frameworks.
Jurisdictional Conflict Between Federal and State Powers
At the heart of this legal battle lies a fundamental question: which level of government holds regulatory authority over prediction markets? The CFTC maintains that Congressional legislation established its exclusive oversight role.
State authorities counter this interpretation. They classify sports-oriented event contracts as gambling merchandise requiring state gaming authorization. Multiple states have initiated both civil litigation and criminal prosecutions against these platforms.
Recently in Arizona, judicial proceedings paused a criminal prosecution involving Kalshi. The presiding judge indicated the CFTC would likely prevail in demonstrating federal law supremacy over state gambling statutes.
Relief Sought by Federal Regulators
The CFTC’s Wisconsin filing identifies Governor Anthony Evers, Attorney General Josh Kaul, and the Wisconsin Gaming Division as defendants.
Federal regulators requested judicial determination that state gambling legislation cannot govern federally regulated prediction platforms. Additionally, the complaint seeks a permanent injunction preventing Wisconsin from pursuing enforcement actions against these operators.
Both Coinbase and Robinhood, which trade on public exchanges, appear among the platforms named in Wisconsin’s state-level complaint. Gemini was separately identified in New York’s litigation against Coinbase.
Last week, New York filed suit against Coinbase and Gemini concerning their prediction market services. The CFTC countered New York’s action with its own lawsuit within days.
At publication time, the Wisconsin Department of Justice, Division of Gaming, and Governor Evers’ office had not provided responses to media inquiries.





