TLDR
- CFTC grants Phantom no-action relief tied to IB registration rules
- Phantom can route trades to DCMs and FCMs without holding user funds
- Relief applies only under strict compliance and disclosure conditions
- Move addresses role of non-custodial crypto software in derivatives
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has issued a no-action position to Phantom Technologies. The decision allows Phantom to offer trading interfaces without registering as an introducing broker.
The relief applies to Phantom’s self-custodial wallet software. It lets users route derivatives trades to registered entities while Phantom avoids direct regulatory registration.
Relief Applies to Non-Custodial Wallet Software
The CFTC’s Market Participants Division issued the no-action letter in response to Phantom’s request. The company develops software that allows users to control their own digital assets.
Under the decision, MPD will not recommend enforcement action against Phantom. This applies if the company does not register as an introducing broker. The same applies to its personnel acting as associated persons.
The relief is limited to specific activities. Phantom can provide front-end tools that connect users to registered futures commission merchants and designated contract markets. These services support trading in CFTC-regulated derivatives.
Phantom does not take custody of user funds. This detail played a key role in the decision. The software only enables order routing and user interaction with registered market participants.
The CFTC stated that the position depends on certain conditions. These include clear disclosures about risks and conflicts. Phantom must also maintain policies for marketing and communications.
Conditions and Compliance Requirements
The no-action relief includes strict requirements. Phantom must provide disclosures about derivatives trading risks. It must also inform users about any potential conflicts of interest.
The company is required to maintain internal compliance policies. These policies must govern how it promotes and explains its services. It must also keep records tied to its derivatives-related activities.
The relief applies only to the described business model. Any change in how Phantom operates could affect the position. The CFTC made clear that the decision is not a broad exemption.
The agency stated that the no-action position is limited in scope. It only covers failure to register as an introducing broker. It does not address other potential regulatory obligations.
This approach allows the CFTC to monitor evolving market structures. At the same time, it provides space for certain software models to operate under defined limits.
Broader Regulatory Context for Crypto Developers
The decision comes as regulators review how existing laws apply to crypto software developers. Questions remain about when such developers must register as intermediaries.
Recent legal actions have brought attention to this issue. Cases involving privacy tools and crypto mixers have raised concerns about developer liability. These include actions tied to Tornado Cash and Samourai Wallet.
CFTC Chair Michael Selig said the agency is working on further guidance. The goal is to clarify when non-custodial software providers fall under registration rules.
The Phantom decision reflects this ongoing effort. It addresses a specific use case while broader policy work continues. The agency aims to define clear boundaries for software providers.





