TLDR
- Police in Gangnam lost 22 BTC after failing to retain private keys
- Bithumb glitch credited 620,000 BTC instead of 620,000 won
- Finance minister orders audit of seized digital assets
- Government to strengthen custody rules and security controls
South Korea has ordered an urgent review of how government agencies manage seized cryptocurrency after a series of failures exposed weak custody controls. The move follows a lost Bitcoin case and a major exchange system error. Officials say new safeguards will be introduced to prevent further losses and restore public trust.
Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol announced the review on Saturday. He said authorities would inspect digital assets held through seizures and enforcement actions. The government aims to tighten oversight and improve internal procedures.
Bitcoin Loss Prompts Custody Review
The review follows reports that police in Seoul’s Gangnam district lost access to 22 Bitcoin in 2022. The assets were worth about $1.4 million at the time of disclosure. Officers allowed a third-party firm to manage the wallet and did not retain the private keys. As a result, the funds were lost, and an investigation began. Two suspects have since been arrested. Prosecutors are also examining possible bribery linked to the case.
The incident revealed gaps in how seized digital assets were handled. Law enforcement failed to follow established custody guidelines. The case raised concerns about accountability and internal supervision. Koo addressed the issue in a statement posted on X. He said the government would inspect current practices across public institutions.
“Together with relevant agencies such as the Financial Services Commission and the Financial Supervisory Service, the government will inspect the current status and management practices,” he said. He added that corrective steps would be introduced quickly to prevent a recurrence. He also clarified that the state does not hold digital assets outside legal enforcement actions.
Bithumb Glitch Raises System Concerns
The custody review comes weeks after a separate incident at crypto exchange Bithumb. In February 2026, a system error credited users with 620,000 Bitcoin instead of 620,000 Korean won. The mistake briefly created about $40 billion in incorrect balances.
Most of the funds were later recovered, but the event exposed technical weaknesses. Regulators faced criticism for not detecting the flaw earlier. The error increased pressure on authorities to examine digital asset systems more closely. Although the exchange is a private entity, the glitch added urgency to the government’s response.
Officials acknowledged that both public and private sectors face operational risks in crypto management. The finance ministry has not released specific reform measures. However, agencies are expected to review wallet security standards and internal approval procedures. Automated systems and external contractors may also face tighter controls.
Government Plans Stronger Controls
Koo said the inspection would cover all digital assets obtained through seizures and tax enforcement. Authorities will review how assets are stored and who has access to private keys. Clear lines of responsibility are expected to be defined. The government plans to coordinate with the Financial Services Commission and the Financial Supervisory Service. These agencies oversee financial institutions and exchanges.
Their cooperation may support broader compliance checks. South Korea has seen growth in crypto trading and enforcement actions. As digital assets become more common in criminal cases, custody demands have increased. Public institutions now face higher technical requirements. Officials have stated that reforms will focus on security and prevention of human error.
Further details are expected after the review is completed. The finance ministry said additional updates would be shared once inspections conclude. The recent cases have placed attention on how governments manage confiscated cryptocurrency. South Korea’s response signals a shift toward stricter oversight and structured handling of seized digital assets.





